Sigma 17-50 2.8

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Post Reply
User avatar
roysmith
Heirophant
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:08 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:
Contact roysmith

Sigma 17-50 2.8

Unread post by roysmith »

Any opinions on this new lens? Has anyone yet had the chance to try it? I'm thinking of buying it instead of the Tamron 17-50 2.8... I like better the EX series from Sigma, they feel more solid. I believe it should be quite good optically as it seems very similar to the Sigma 17-70 2.8-4 which is a good lens (or at least I think so).
Top
User avatar
roysmith
Heirophant
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:08 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:
Contact roysmith

Re: Sigma 17-50 2.8

Unread post by roysmith »

Well I've ordered it and should be here in less than a month. I found a review, maybe the first one, here in case anyone is interested (it's in spanish but google can translate it). So far looks like a pretty good lens, better than the Tamron... at least in paper ;)
As soon as I have it I'll let you know how good it really is :)
Top
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:
Contact KevinBarrett

Re: Sigma 17-50 2.8

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

We'll certainly be interested in hearing about how you find this lens. I hope it works out well for you!
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Lens Lore”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests