Page 1 of 1
KM 100mm 2.8 SF & KM 85mm 1.4 G D
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 11:14 am
by Mr_Alpha_2011
ok so i have had this headache with these lenses.
its like im THINKING to sell/trade the SF and get the 85 one, and then i rethink like nahhh....so im asking for help to make up my mind over one of these two!
100mm 2.8 SF vs 85mm 1.4 G D
though on Dyxum.com they give almost the same scores.
Re: KM 100mm 2.8 SF & KM 85mm 1.4 G D
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:59 pm
by Dr. Harout
Definitely 85/1.4 G
Re: KM 100mm 2.8 SF & KM 85mm 1.4 G D
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:23 pm
by pakodominguez
I had both. I kept the 100 SF and sold the 85mm the day I tried both on the A850 because that focal distance works better for me, specially for portraits. Then, it is smaller and lighter, easier to carry on my bag. The SF is, at "0" and f2.8, as sharp or sharper than the 85mm at 2.8.
I understand DK didn't liked the 100 SF on FF, for me it works perfectly.
Regards
Re: KM 100mm 2.8 SF & KM 85mm 1.4 G D
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:09 am
by David Kilpatrick
Hey no, I love the 100mm SF. I just do not have much use for it, I am keeping it. It is a unique lens which would cost £800+ to make today. And it's amazingly sharp when SF is not used.
David
Re: KM 100mm 2.8 SF & KM 85mm 1.4 G D
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:40 am
by Mr_Alpha_2011
David Kilpatrick wrote:Hey no, I love the 100mm SF. I just do not have much use for it, I am keeping it. It is a unique lens which would cost £800+ to make today. And it's amazingly sharp when SF is not used.
David
thats how i look at it! not to mention i bought mine new not used for like $830 (and there is other new minolta lenses in the shop still
)