http://www.minhembio.com/forum/uploads/ ... 040782.jpg
Look at the fabric at the bottom right corner, A900 has sligthly more detail than D700 and better grain/noise structure ...
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Who would have thought that huh
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Yes, it was David K here that repported that D300 uses twice the exposure!bossel wrote:I'd say thats looking very good! Also to consider, I read somewhere (for the D300) that for the same ISO/F-Stop/EV Value the Nikon chooses a slower shutter time to avoid noise in the shadows. Do you have the exif for these two shots?
I am aware Don, but after the right firmware version a comparison with A700 would be very very interesting (but strictly on a DT lens, or 1.5 crop on A900 + other lenses).Sonolta wrote:D3/D700/D300/A700/KM5D all crunch the current a900 in high ISO IQ...The a900 needs an upgrade to improve it's high ISO performance before it is released to the public, as the samples on the thread below so clearly demonstrate.
http://www.photoclubalpha.com/forum/vie ... f=32&t=829
-Sonolta
I'm not sure how you upgrade a un-released product. I've worked in software development for 12 years and I've never seen it happen.Sonolta wrote:D3/D700/D300/A700/KM5D all crunch the current a900 in high ISO IQ. We know this from reviewing the image samples posted at the respectable review sites...The a900 clearly needs an immediate *upgrade* to improve it's high ISO performance before it is released to the public.
See this thread for samples and discussion.
http://www.photoclubalpha.com/forum/vie ... f=32&t=829
-Sonolta
Am I glad to hear that from you Don.Sonolta wrote:Yeah...I am getting the raw picture now! I have been a little busier than normal the past couple weeks do to hurricane season here in the states...Once my server calms down *and* I get 750GB of files backed up that I am working on now, I will have more time to study the a900 files. Yeah, I jumped on the early JPGs as I wanted usable JPGs and they do not seem to be quite the quality I was expecting. I shoot JPGs on my KMs, but Raw on the Sony's so I guess that it is no big change for me anyway.
I agree...Raw stuff is looking mightily detailed for sure.![]()
-Sonolta
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests