Funny, Greg! (If English were my mother tongue, you could count on me to join your forces against all the ruffians here who might be secretly thinking of bashing our one and only Sonolta…)
Alfonso
A900 vs. D700 @ DPReview
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Re: A900 vs. D700 @ DPReview
That's exactly what I'm trying to say. JPGs don't have to look good at 100% but they have to print well or be perfect at web size, because you will print them or resize for web most of the time. Perhaps A900 jpgs are not so bad when printed or resized (I'm trying to understand why Sony decided to process them this way, provided that they are not incompetent).Sonolta wrote:LOL...NO, Not Quite! JPGs are also for people that can get the shot right in-camera...that way we don't need to do post production at all, and we don't waste unnecessary time and storage space either
Gianluca
Re: A900 vs. D700 @ DPReview
Here in France we call them algorithmsSonolta wrote:Sony does it this way because they did not have time to refine the processing logarithms...
But I agree, a V4 update for the A900 might be appropriate, for those who need the jpgs.
Re: A900 vs. D700 @ DPReview
That's quite a sophisticated typo! For a short moment I thought you really meant logarithmsSonolta wrote:Thanks for pointing out my typo. Yes...bring it on!![]()
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests