a900, display very bright an crisp, pics underexposed
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:01 pm
Hi community!
As a long time minolta photographer, since the days of XD7, X700, I presently use a Dynax 7D, an newly the a900.
The 7D is mainly set aside because of reviews stating that on the a900, evaluating taken pictures is hihgly improved. And FF is finally back to the days that we had control over DOF.
First pics with the a900 are a bit dissapointing. Judging the pics on the display, I tend to underexpose. Pics on the display look bright an crips as if miracles have happend to taking pics with the a900.
The pics though are not that bright and crisp, rather dull, underexposed more like.
I already changed the brightnes of the display back to standard.
Now you all gonna say to me, change to RAW, as I'm still used taking pics in Jpeg...........
Thanks!
Paul, Netherlands.
As a long time minolta photographer, since the days of XD7, X700, I presently use a Dynax 7D, an newly the a900.
The 7D is mainly set aside because of reviews stating that on the a900, evaluating taken pictures is hihgly improved. And FF is finally back to the days that we had control over DOF.
First pics with the a900 are a bit dissapointing. Judging the pics on the display, I tend to underexpose. Pics on the display look bright an crips as if miracles have happend to taking pics with the a900.
The pics though are not that bright and crisp, rather dull, underexposed more like.
I already changed the brightnes of the display back to standard.
Now you all gonna say to me, change to RAW, as I'm still used taking pics in Jpeg...........
Thanks!
Paul, Netherlands.