A900 and a Tamron1.4x converter examples
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
A900 and a Tamron1.4x converter examples
A900 seems to be doing alright with "pedestrian" converters. Here is an example of an image taken with
A900 + Tamron 1.4x converter using a Vivitar Ser 1 70-210/f2.8-4 AF lens. The image following that is
a 100% crop. As always, all comments are appreciated. For the rest of the images, you can go here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsur/
with best regards,
Sury
image:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3118/314 ... 5a1a_b.jpg
100% crop
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3087/314 ... 46a1_b.jpg
A900 + Tamron 1.4x converter using a Vivitar Ser 1 70-210/f2.8-4 AF lens. The image following that is
a 100% crop. As always, all comments are appreciated. For the rest of the images, you can go here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsur/
with best regards,
Sury
image:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3118/314 ... 5a1a_b.jpg
100% crop
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3087/314 ... 46a1_b.jpg
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: A900 and a Tamron1.4x converter examples
Impressive but central - most teleconverters are OK for central resolution, it is at the edges they lose it.
David
David
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Couple of questions
David,
If the teleconverters lose out on edges, then are they preferred to be used in a FF camera rather than on a APS-C body? Especially
something like A900 which has plenty of pixels to spare? Also, should I be using center weighted or spot metering?
with best regards,
Sury
If the teleconverters lose out on edges, then are they preferred to be used in a FF camera rather than on a APS-C body? Especially
something like A900 which has plenty of pixels to spare? Also, should I be using center weighted or spot metering?
with best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: A900 and a Tamron1.4x converter examples
Most will be worse on full frame, better on APS-C. I don't think it matters what metering you use, but be sure never to overexpose. For many tele shots, with no sky and a darker subject like animal fur, minus 1 stop over-ride is always worth setting - a smaller aperture and faster shutter speed always help with TC/zoom combinations.
David
David
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Question on underexposing
David,
Thank you very much for your prompt response. Much appreciated. Talking about under exposure,
I am finding that my better shots with any adapter (whether TC, M42/MA, MD/MA) are when I underexpose
the image deliberately on both A900 and A100. I have not had time yet to open the A700 (still in the box)
to experiment with.
I am wondering why that is the case. I am finding this phenomenon consistently with about half a dozen MD lenses, a MF mirror lens and
about 4 M42 lenses. These lenses have fairly distributed focal lengths (45mm to 500mm). Only thing I can think of is the technology used
to caliberate lenses in yesteryears gave more conservative readings. A F4 lens might be (slightly) faster than F4 but they played it safe, for example.
Any comments?
With best regards,
Sury
Thank you very much for your prompt response. Much appreciated. Talking about under exposure,
I am finding that my better shots with any adapter (whether TC, M42/MA, MD/MA) are when I underexpose
the image deliberately on both A900 and A100. I have not had time yet to open the A700 (still in the box)
to experiment with.
I am wondering why that is the case. I am finding this phenomenon consistently with about half a dozen MD lenses, a MF mirror lens and
about 4 M42 lenses. These lenses have fairly distributed focal lengths (45mm to 500mm). Only thing I can think of is the technology used
to caliberate lenses in yesteryears gave more conservative readings. A F4 lens might be (slightly) faster than F4 but they played it safe, for example.
Any comments?
With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: A900 and a Tamron1.4x converter examples
I can just tell you from experience that the lowering in contrast produced by adding a telecon is always best tackled by keeping exposure to the minimum. Along with the typical cropped compositions resulting. Individual TCs may also affect metering, especially on the old MD system, by failing to maintain a perfect link the MC coupling ring - and on the AF system, the aperture mechanism may also not be accurate.
David
David
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: A900 and a Tamron1.4x converter examples
David,
Thank you. Your statement about keeping the exposure to minimum vindicates my position that the manual
lenses seem to do better when the light is bright (not a problem in Silicon Valley, CA) or with a flash. Anything
in between is pretty much a wash (no pun intended).
With best regards,
Sury
Thank you. Your statement about keeping the exposure to minimum vindicates my position that the manual
lenses seem to do better when the light is bright (not a problem in Silicon Valley, CA) or with a flash. Anything
in between is pretty much a wash (no pun intended).
With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests