A200- AF accuracy.
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:29 am
I am starting to have some serious doubts as to the accuracy of the A200 autofocus in low light conditions, even sometimes in not so low light too.
No questions in better light, that the A200 is notably faster than the Km5d, I have not yet really had much chance to test things for tracking, I don't often do shots like this.
Also, I don't believe the body I have is showing any major problems with FF/BF, rather that it makes mistakes at times that I would not expect it to. I even have had some wa shots (20mm at non fast apertures) where it's decided to confirm focus and give me a nice sharp background, ignoring the main subject. I took both to do some horse jumping shots indoors, and the 5d consistently gave more accurate AF in these conditions with a variety of lenses. In the end I bagged the A200 and used the KM for the rest of the shots. I know there have been examples of the 50mm primes giving problems, and that obviously it's better to have double cross sensors aka A700, film 7. But even with the 50mm..AF accuracy is better with the 5d, and having been on a bit of a 35mm rampage of late, the film 60 is also proving to be accurate even in low light conditions without any AF assist..with the 50mm as well.
This does not happen all the time with the A200, but maybe more than I would expect, it can get the accuracy at times.
I wonder if the specs for the AF make any difference, both the 5d and 60 have EV-1 for AF, the A200 is I think EV 0.
It's not all bad news A200 wise, the flash metering is good..consistent, though I remain convinced the metering is a bit off (5d was a bit over in some cases, the A200 is mostly under..half way between the 2 would be ideal!) A200 is pretty nice on colours..better than I expected. Shame that I don't feel confident with the AF at times. Anyone got any thoughts on this at all?? Even with other bodies etc.
No questions in better light, that the A200 is notably faster than the Km5d, I have not yet really had much chance to test things for tracking, I don't often do shots like this.
Also, I don't believe the body I have is showing any major problems with FF/BF, rather that it makes mistakes at times that I would not expect it to. I even have had some wa shots (20mm at non fast apertures) where it's decided to confirm focus and give me a nice sharp background, ignoring the main subject. I took both to do some horse jumping shots indoors, and the 5d consistently gave more accurate AF in these conditions with a variety of lenses. In the end I bagged the A200 and used the KM for the rest of the shots. I know there have been examples of the 50mm primes giving problems, and that obviously it's better to have double cross sensors aka A700, film 7. But even with the 50mm..AF accuracy is better with the 5d, and having been on a bit of a 35mm rampage of late, the film 60 is also proving to be accurate even in low light conditions without any AF assist..with the 50mm as well.
This does not happen all the time with the A200, but maybe more than I would expect, it can get the accuracy at times.
I wonder if the specs for the AF make any difference, both the 5d and 60 have EV-1 for AF, the A200 is I think EV 0.
It's not all bad news A200 wise, the flash metering is good..consistent, though I remain convinced the metering is a bit off (5d was a bit over in some cases, the A200 is mostly under..half way between the 2 would be ideal!) A200 is pretty nice on colours..better than I expected. Shame that I don't feel confident with the AF at times. Anyone got any thoughts on this at all?? Even with other bodies etc.