Sony quality control problems

Specifically for the discussion of the A-mount DSLR range
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Atgets_Apprentice
Grand Caliph
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:02 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Atgets_Apprentice »

David Kilpatrick wrote:
The Alpha 77 does not, in my opinion, have a QC problem - it has an actual mistake. My package included the previous version of the Sony software burned to CD, incorrectly labelled with the new version. The installation for Mac was actually a full year out of date and of course wrong for A77 files. The camera seems to have included the wrong firmware version. Could these be connected? Maybe, maybe not. Depends on whether there is a process where final firmware is burned shortly before delivery and manuals and CDs are added. The manual comes with an erratum sheet which indicates there was a clear change to an intended specification.


I think QC is not exactly the same as errors of the firmware/software kind. QC on the camera components and assembly was probably carried out diligently and they may prove very reliable and well-made. But the same could be said of a perfectly well-made computer which is hopeless because a poor operating system or the wrong BIOS has been loaded. It's QC but not manufacturing QC or component sourcing QC. More human error I would guess - and that happens.

David
These ARE QC issues, both in manufacturing (Firmware) & product packaging (software). If these things were checked before the camera left Sony, they would not have left the factory, therfore Sonys' QC IS lacking.

Regarding the QC problems with Canons black spots, or the focusing problems (of the EOS 1D mkIII?), Canon held their hands up, and rectified the issues, whereas Sony have made no such announcement, aknowledged any problems, or made any effort to put things right in any cohesive way. In fact, other than the instances reported here, and on other sites members have posted links to, the only mention of QC or customer services failings at Sony was in the letters page of Amateur Photographer two weeks ago.

It is sad that there is a negative vibe here, which I admit to having contributed to, but the real fault at the root of the negativity lies with Sony. If they had the guts or the gumption to admit there are issues with their cameras, and say what they intend to do about them, it would improve their standing in the eyes of many here, if, of course, they were to come good on any promises made.

A small start in that direction would be for Mr Genge to answer the questions posed to him on Facebook over a week ago, which he said he'd try to answer during last week. Still waiting...... :roll:
XG-1, XD-5, XD-7, X-500, XG1n, X300, 7000i, 700si, 800si, 500si Super, 600si, Dynax 5, KM 7D, a100, a200, a300, a580. And another 600si.....
gio67
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:27 am

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by gio67 »

I must agree with David on this issue,I get a bit fed up with constant negativity from the same people although I don't class Henry as one of them, hoiwever referring to other threads on other sites etc is very negative I,m sure people can search them out for themselves, I have had the A1;A2;alpha 100 alpha 200 ,alpha 700 and most recently the alpha 580 plus various lenses , flashes, radio remotes and have never had a problem with any of them,although I gave the alpha 100 to my son and he managed to break it in a week through ie nonchalantly throwing it into the boot of his car, which shows theres no accounting for mishandling,especially electronics, however maybe it's that I'm more careful than lucky
User avatar
[SiC]
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Hammarö, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by [SiC] »

Actually my Minolta 500si from ~98 has a control wheel problem, maybe the problem dates back even further than that? :-o
Sony A700, A580, Nex-5t, KM D7D & VC-7D, M Dynax 500si
KM 17-35 F2.8-4 D, M 50 F1.7 RS, M 135 F2.8, M 28-100 F3.5-5.6 D, M 100-200 F4.5, T 70-300 F4-5.6 Di USD, S 18-55 F3.5-5.6 SAM, S 18-70 F3.5-5.6
Sony hvl-f42s, Minolta 3600 HS D
Sony Z1C & Z2
User avatar
Scooterman
Oligarch
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 4:14 pm
Location: F.O.D. Uk

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Scooterman »

David Kilpatrick wrote:Henry's posts are giving this forum such a negative feel that I doubt we will have any Alpha users left soon. I have owned KM7D, KM5D, A100 (x2 together), 200 (x2 together), 700 (x2 because of issue), 350 (x3, still got two), 550, 580, 900, 55, 77, NEX-5 and also used for test purposes several others.

None of these cameras has ever developed the kind of issues others encounter, maybe I don't use them enough. The only one with what I would consider to be a defect was the A700 with a faulty CMOS sensor, a line of bad pixels. But it was no worse than both the Canon 7Ds I've had to test, which had random bad pixels and banding patterns at higher ISOs.

The Alpha 77 does not, in my opinion, have a QC problem - it has an actual mistake. My package included the previous version of the Sony software burned to CD, incorrectly labelled with the new version. The installation for Mac was actually a full year out of date and of course wrong for A77 files. The camera seems to have included the wrong firmware version. Could these be connected? Maybe, maybe not. Depends on whether there is a process where final firmware is burned shortly before delivery and manuals and CDs are added. The manual comes with an erratum sheet which indicates there was a clear change to an intended specification.

SanDisk trusted the Alpha 77 enough to use it at their big London event last week, because the Alpha 77 is the only camera made which can use their new ultra fast SDXC cards - clearing the buffer in 18 seconds after a 12fps RAW burst, instead of the 45 seconds reported for SDHC cards of the fastest current speed. I would hazard a guess that latest firmware versions were used.

I think QC is not exactly the same as errors of the firmware/software kind. QC on the camera components and assembly was probably carried out diligently and they may prove very reliable and well-made. But the same could be said of a perfectly well-made computer which is hopeless because a poor operating system or the wrong BIOS has been loaded. It's QC but not manufacturing QC or component sourcing QC. More human error I would guess - and that happens.

When I find an problem, I report. But I don't keep reporting the same issue for post after post, or putting a link in one thread and then posting a new thread with exactly the same link just to highlight problems. Nor have I, so far, removed any such repetitive posts. But I'm getting fed up with the general tone of several parts of the forum. If I was an interested visitor, I'd have stopped reading and probably forgotten any ideas of being interested in the Alpha system by now.

David
I whole heartedly agree with you David, if there are issues yes report it, but one or two people just snipe all the time and why I have not been on the forum for quite a while.
My friend Peter who uses both A-900 and the A-77 is now using the A-77 more, he loves it and has never had any problems at all, I will be having a play with it (the A-77) on Tuesday weather permiting, I use at the moment my 2 A-580 bodies and I love them, if I get on well with the A-77 that will be next on my list.
Regards
Richard
Bengeo
Initiate
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 10:13 am
Location: Herts
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Bengeo »

David Kilpatrick wrote: SanDisk trusted the Alpha 77 enough to use it at their big London event last week, because the Alpha 77 is the only camera made which can use their new ultra fast SDXC cards - clearing the buffer in 18 seconds after a 12fps RAW burst, instead of the 45 seconds reported for SDHC cards of the fastest current speed. I would hazard a guess that latest firmware versions were used.
David - are you sure about those timings?

I've got a Sandisk Extreme Pro 45MB/s card and my A77 (1.02) clears the buffer in about 15 seconds. I've got the Sandisk 90MB/s SDXC card on order and I would hope that will clear the buffer in under 10 seconds!

Andy
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

I am still strong on my decision to acquire an a77. The only question is from where?
I really hope it will be available in Dubai by the end of this month, if so I'll have it in my hands within the first week of November (though I really doubt the availability).
Anyone visiting Armenia in the near future?
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by pakodominguez »

David Kilpatrick wrote:Henry's posts are giving this forum such a negative feel that I doubt we will have any Alpha users left soon.
http://www.photoclubalpha.com/forum/vie ... 165#p61176
pakodominguez wrote: I don't think the spirit of this thread is to solve issues, but just to "report" them.
And that's the reason I didn't want to participate on this forum until now. Because I think it is useless.
David Kilpatrick wrote:I have owned KM7D, KM5D, A100 (x2 together), 200 (x2 together), 700 (x2 because of issue), 350 (x3, still got two), 550, 580, 900, 55, 77, NEX-5 and also used for test purposes several others.

None of these cameras has ever developed the kind of issues others encounter, maybe I don't use them enough.
I only had to send the Maxxum 7D (and Flashes) to the service because inconsistency with flash. Otherwise I could love cameras for different reasons (7D, A700) or hate others (A100). But never experienced a mayor quality issue with my cameras. In other hand, I understand that sampling occurs, more and more, and someone have to suffer it.

Regards
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
bossel
Viceroy
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: France, Côte d'Azur

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by bossel »

Dr. Harout wrote:Anyone visiting Armenia in the near future?
Hey, had you asked before, our Sarko national went to Armenia, I could have given him an A77 for you :mrgreen:
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

bossel wrote:
Dr. Harout wrote:Anyone visiting Armenia in the near future?
Hey, had you asked before, our Sarko national went to Armenia, I could have given him an A77 for you :mrgreen:
Well, since his wife was not accompanying... :mrgreen:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
bossel
Viceroy
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: France, Côte d'Azur

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by bossel »

David Kilpatrick wrote:... posts are giving this forum such a negative feel that I doubt we will have any Alpha users left soon... David
Well, it's an internet forum and we can't stop people telling their thoughts. Some are more insisting than others, or have more time. There are many posts of some members which upset me and 3 months later I discover they think like me (which is a good thing :mrgreen: ). We will never agree, all of us. As long as me and my wife are not insulted, I can just ignore posts I consider pointless. On any forum people will debate over EVF vs OVF and NEX vs SLT vs SLR and why Nikon or Sony or Canon are better and I won't stop them. Just keep in mind your audience. On an Audi forum, having been an Audi driver, I could share my thoughts about my new BMW. Insisting on the superiority of my BMW, noone would appreciate. Not saying Audi is better than BMW, just a question how and who you talk to.
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I reckon Skoda is better than Audi cos some are used in Le Tour de France :lol:
Greg
twm47099
Oligarch
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:20 am
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by twm47099 »

I think the disappointment is that Sony fails to acknowledge that there are some characteristic failures with their cameras that are design related (I don't consider them QC problems).

KM at least acknowledged the FBF problem and did have it fixed for free well outside of the warranty period.

On the other hand, I believe that Sony has tried to fix the classic Minolta aperture motor failure problem in their newer cameras (As a failure mode it was not widespread, but apparently goes way back -- my Maxxum 7 had it, and as far as I know the only characteristic failure mode of the Minoltas.)

I just wish Sony would spend a little more effort when they release a new camera to make sure there are no built in problems that the first buyer will find.

tom
User avatar
edrice
Oligarch
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 12:35 am
Location: Sunny Southern California

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by edrice »

It seems that the A77 and A65 pre-order pages have disappeared from Amazon. My account order page says that they are experiencing a delay.

Suppose this could be related?

Ed
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

In Thailand it rains mainly around the Sony plant, but seriously it seems they have had lots of flooding in the district where the plant is, the factory is ok but workers can’t get to work and transport/deliveries etc. are in disarray, there was a thread at dpr about it, so it looks like there might be some delays filling existing orders.
Greg
User avatar
edrice
Oligarch
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 12:35 am
Location: Sunny Southern California

Re: Sony quality control problems

Unread post by edrice »

The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain.

I guess it's enough that they didn't want to except any more pre-orders.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests