Review Alpha 380
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:48 pm
The Dutch photomagazine Focus (in business over 96 years) tested the new alpha 280 in its July/August edition. Summarising the results of this article, we find on the plus side:
- superior live view system (as fast as normal focussing)
- LCD screen (also much better readable in the sun compared to the alpha 350)
- easier to use
On the downside:
- no improvements on the higher ISO colour noise (they specifically mention that they were disappointed Sony did not enhance this and Sony is lagging the competition from ISO 800 onwards, although noise reduction is not too agressive)
- no film function (the article does mention that at first it looked that Sony was also lagging the Live View implementation and then showed a superior version; it seems to suggest that Sony may do the same in future cameras.)
- grip on the body may be too small for anyone with (slightly) bigger hands (you need to buy the battery grip)
Their conclusion: very good (super is the highest award). Average of 8,2. Measured on a 1-10 scale.
More details can be read in the article itself.
It seems that Sony missed an opportunity to really improve the image quality.
- superior live view system (as fast as normal focussing)
- LCD screen (also much better readable in the sun compared to the alpha 350)
- easier to use
On the downside:
- no improvements on the higher ISO colour noise (they specifically mention that they were disappointed Sony did not enhance this and Sony is lagging the competition from ISO 800 onwards, although noise reduction is not too agressive)
- no film function (the article does mention that at first it looked that Sony was also lagging the Live View implementation and then showed a superior version; it seems to suggest that Sony may do the same in future cameras.)
- grip on the body may be too small for anyone with (slightly) bigger hands (you need to buy the battery grip)
Their conclusion: very good (super is the highest award). Average of 8,2. Measured on a 1-10 scale.
More details can be read in the article itself.
It seems that Sony missed an opportunity to really improve the image quality.