Sensor PPI

Specifically for the discussion of the A-mount DSLR range
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Sensor PPI

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I thought it might be interesting too list a bit of a comparison of the horizontal pixels per inch of a couple of sensors.

A100 sensor (23.6 X 15.8mm)
10MP 3872X2592 = 4167.3 PPI

A350 sensor (23.5 X 15.7mm)
14MP 4592X3056 = 4963.3 PPI

A900 sensor (41 X 31.9mm)
24.6MP 6096X4056 = 3776.5 PPI

I obtained the info from a couple of places on the web and I don't have any reason to beleive that it substantially incorrect anywhere....as can be seen the pixel density of the A900 is still less than the A100 even though it's a 25MP class camera.
Greg
ps I'd still love one (A900 that is) :wink:
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sensor PPI

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

I thought the A900 sensor was 24mm x 36mm or am I missing something? :roll:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Sensor PPI

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

You're right Dr. H, now I can't remember/find that page again..I just wrote down what was there, (it even had the 5.94um pixel size as well)...but if you calculate on the horizontal size of 36mm, that still gives a good density of 4301PPI which is still less than the A350.
Greg
ps I see the Russians are going back home again...I hope.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sensor PPI

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Roughly calculating, yes A350 has more pixels/same area than A900 sensor. Also the latter should have the same amount of pixels as A700. But it is not only pixel count as we all know... :wink:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Winston
Grand Caliph
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:29 pm

Re: Sensor PPI

Unread post by Winston »

DPR is now listing the pixel density of all cameras. Here's the Sony page:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Sony/
Winston Mitchell
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Sensor PPI

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Yes, DPR have all the current cameras listed there except the sensor for the A900, and that is the interesting one too compare against the others, after I got a rough idea of the density (and resolution) figures it seemed to me that it wasn't all doom and gloom for our lenses after all, of course there is still light fall-off and various aberrations too worry about.....if you're really into worrying that is. :)
Greg
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Sensor PPI

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I went and got the figures for the A700 just to complete the picture, going by an article I read you are can use it ( horizontal PPI) as a rough guide on how much demand a given sensor places on lenses.
A100 = 4167
A700 = 4634
A350 = 4963
A900 = 4301
Greg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests