Page 1 of 1

Chromasia review of the a99

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:40 pm
by jeep1
Number one photoblogger David Nightingale seems impressed with the A99 see
http://www.chromasia.com/blog/archive/1211141737.php

Re: Chromasia review of the a99

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:33 pm
by Birma
Seems a smart move by Sony in getting some Pros to convert for the price of a body and a couple of lenses. Pity they can't dash some freebies around some of the pros and experts here :)

Re: Chromasia review of the a99

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:50 pm
by mikeriach
Birma wrote:Seems a smart move by Sony in getting some Pros to convert for the price of a body and a couple of lenses. Pity they can't dash some freebies around some of the pros and experts here :)
Here, here. DK more than deserves the opportunity given his historical involvement with M, KM and Sony.

Mike

Re: Chromasia review of the a99

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:16 pm
by David Kilpatrick
It's nothing new, that's exactly how I started with Minolta - offered a camera body with 50mm and two other lenses in return for the rights to several images (used on Minolta lens boxes and for their calendar) which I had taken on the camera during testing - plus a some articles for the club magazine in the UK.

Sony has certainly given equipment to several of the photographers I know in return for personal appearances at launches and events, usually with a good presentation of their test work. Duncan McEwan did this for the A900 launch.

It made sense for Minolta to help out a struggling 22-year-old who couldn't afford ever to have thought about buying what was then very expensive kit. But that was down their exceptional UK PR man. Sony seem to go more for establishment figures and for a while, favoured rather mediocre members of Magnum (no idea why).

David

Re: Chromasia review of the a99

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:36 am
by bfitzgerald
I've no problems with the write up, but 400-500 shots?
I'd struggle to get that with the A57 (which currently has the best rating on the SLT models for shots per charge)

All the makers offload gear to photographers to buy loyalty and blog write up's etc, which is fine. I just find it a bit predictable and rather tedious (ie not that convincing)
I personally don't think it is appropriate to be talking about a specific maker on your photo website/blog, recently Emily Tebbetts (Taylor Swift thing) came under a LOT of fire (not from me but in general) on her blog from Canon users!

Some of the Artisans from Sony are good, and some are not really to my taste (such as Me Ra Koh)
How much impact these folks have overall is probably not that much in the greater scheme of things.

Probably the most successful (least in the UK) advertising wise were the very well known Olympus - David Bailey adverts
I know social media has changed since then where on-line presence has a lot more appeal, it might work for some folks but I've long outgrown brand promotion blogs in exchange for gear.