according to Chasseur d'Images. Their test seems quite good; though there are a few mistakes (like DRO was invented by Minolta and is outdated now). Unlike previous models, it's easy to use (isn't it the same as an A700?). Also, the omission of lifeview now is a serious obstacle.
On the other hand, they talk about the super viewfinder and image quality same as the Canon 1D Mark 3!
A900 shutter noise and ISO 1600 better than D3
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Re: A900 shutter noise and ISO 1600 better than D3
he says: New A900 is brilliant. Maybe he isn't focused on low contrast fine detail in low light cat pics 
Re: A900 shutter noise and ISO 1600 better than D3
This forum would be empty if we'd apply your criteria about who can post and who can't. That's c*nsorsh*p - gotcha!!
Re: A900 shutter noise and ISO 1600 better than D3
Thats funny. I wrote "tha ts cen sor ship!" (without the spaces) and the forum displays "That's c*nsorsh*p - gotcha!!"
A hidden feature?
A hidden feature?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests