Page 1 of 2
Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:27 pm
by Lonnie Utah
In the spirt of forgive and forget, here is what should be an easy/fun one. A few rules...
1) Pics must be taken during the challenge period.
2) Pics must be your own work.
3) Exif data should be imbeded or posted.
4) A brief description of any PP would should be posted. (ie PP included crop, curves, and B/W conversion)
At the end of the challenge period, I will pic 5 finalists, start a poll, and let the club vote on their favorite. In the event of a tie, Aster and I will consult each other and pic a "winner".
Good luck everyone, let's see what you've got.
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:13 am
by Lonnie Utah
One week left. Anybody?
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:22 pm
by David Kilpatrick
All signs are cancelled here due to snow... I usually have lots of sign shots, but I haven't taken a good one over the holiday period. Not even a road closed or a hazard warning for ice, no sign of them anywhere.
David
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:47 pm
by Lonnie Utah
Try indoors my good man!

Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:49 am
by 01af
Try discarding rule #1. I have a few nice signs in my archive ... and so have many others I guess.
-- Olaf
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:55 am
by Lonnie Utah
01af wrote:Try discarding rule #1. I have a few nice signs in my archive ... and so have many others I guess.
Nope. That's part of the challenge, to go out and look for new stuff....
I might extend the time, but I'm not going back to the past. Sorry.
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:47 am
by David Kilpatrick

- threshersliquidationnotice-web.jpg (107.72 KiB) Viewed 7322 times
Depressing sign of the times - supermarket undercutting and loss leaders on alcohol have put this chain out of business.
This shop actually has a long history. It was owned in the 1790s by Robert Nicol, wine merchant, and ballie of the Duke of Roxburghe (tax and rent collector). On the profits of his wine trade, he built the house we now own. A young man came to be apprenticed with him, Adam Pirie; Adam married his daughter, became a successful trader, and eventually Lord Mayor of London.
In 1964 a Highland Scots shopkeeper called Robert Nicol MacDonald bought the shop, and also most of our house (it was then in three parts). He discovered that he was a direct descendant of Robert Nicol, who had started the shop and built the house. But everyone who ever ran that shop - and everyone who ever owned this house - since 1806 has ended up ruined by financial crashes, and forced to sell. 1826, 1890-something, 1929, 1964 (the aftermath of the collapse of the Glasgow Bank), 1988 (Thatcher's boom and bust property value collapse - when we moved here). Bob MacDonald left all the accounts from the shop lying in our coach-house; he just closed the door on it. He said it was a VAT inspection which ended his business.
So now the shop has, yet again, gone bust. It's been a wine merchant (or off-licence) for over 200 years. I don't think I'll put in a bid for the lease.
David
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:57 am
by david antony
Taken Jan 5 2010 Ladner B.C.

Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:29 pm
by Philip
How about this, taken last night, 30sec, f4.5, iso320, A900 CZ24-70 @24mm - I think the cross falls within the category of being a sign...........
Philip
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:26 pm
by David Kilpatrick
Burning cross, all you needed was a moon... slightly brightly spooky church advertising!
Here's a local sign which is especially appropriate in our present conditions - probably a surer way of meeting your maker:

- snowykelso-14-pca.jpg (172.56 KiB) Viewed 7282 times
David
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:22 am
by Ewannawe
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:07 pm
by BruceKingston
OK, so it's a boring photo of an uninteresting sign and it doesn't bear comparison with the others posted as offerings to this challenge (particularly Philips which I think takes the award to this point!!).....BUT, it was the 6th photo I took after taking my new CZ 135 f1.8 out of the box when I got home an hour ago. Yes, the sign is at the end of my drive so I didn't go far to take it. No, nothing special about the picture, the composition or anything, but did I tell you IT WAS TAKEN WITH MY NEW CZ 135 F1.8 lens

Only 9 photos taken to this point, all within 10 meters of the back door but this lens is NEVER coming off my A900!
Can you tell I'm happy? Hah! It's nearly dark outside too. Again - Hah! Have to go now, there's photos to take and it doesn't even matter that it's night time. I'm not going to work tomorrow!

- _DSC9863.jpg (189.86 KiB) Viewed 7253 times
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:53 pm
by Ewannawe
BruceKingston wrote: but did I tell you IT WAS TAKEN WITH MY NEW CZ 135 F1.8 lens
Congratulations!
(There doesn't appear to be an 'I'm so jealous' smilie.)
Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:13 am
by Dr. Harout
Ewannawe wrote:BruceKingston wrote: but did I tell you IT WAS TAKEN WITH MY NEW CZ 135 F1.8 lens
Congratulations!
(There doesn't appear to be an 'I'm so jealous' smilie.)
It's something like this

Re: Challenge #26: Signs. 12/21/2009-1/11/2010
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:15 pm
by kamarulamir
Hope I'm not too late to join..
Taken with a850 + KM24-105.