NEX and Vectis lenses
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:54 pm
With Zenith 39mm (Leica type SLR) thread T-mount the Vectis 80-240mm nearly focused OK attached to the Leica adaptor of the NEX, but the bayonet is only just able to fit a doctored T-mount. Using a Leica thread lens reversing ring and duct tape, I was able to fit one of my two 80-240mm APO guinea-pigs to the mount within 1mm or so of correct register (38mm).
Effectively it's got a Leica taped as close to the mount as anything will allow. A custom mount for NEX would seem possible, but the NEX lens has electronic operation of both focus and aperture, like the NEX, and may use entirely different pinouts, power levels and protocols. The most likely match would be the aperture mechanism, and if this could be made to function, the lens would be half usable. If power could be supplied to the correct pins to enable the focus-by-wire action, that would complete the job.
As it stands, the 80-240mm Vectis APO f/4.5-5.6 is a really neat size of lens for the NEX and Sony could do far worse than remake this in an OS version for NEX. At full aperture, performance up to 200mm is very good but a familiar softness (like ther 100-300mm APO D etc) creeps in at 240mm. For 1996, the lens is pretty amazing.

80mm wide open, http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg for original

240mm wide open - http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
Close focus at around 135mm wide open (because the lens can not be stopped down):

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
Around 100mm, same conditions apply:

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
And at 240mm close focus again:

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
This lens has some really good qualities, considering it is not even mounted correctly and is definitely not correctly set up for register, which alters the way the zoom/focus correction functions.
David
As it stands, the 80-240mm Vectis APO f/4.5-5.6 is a really neat size of lens for the NEX and Sony could do far worse than remake this in an OS version for NEX. At full aperture, performance up to 200mm is very good but a familiar softness (like ther 100-300mm APO D etc) creeps in at 240mm. For 1996, the lens is pretty amazing.

80mm wide open, http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg for original

240mm wide open - http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
Close focus at around 135mm wide open (because the lens can not be stopped down):

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
Around 100mm, same conditions apply:

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
And at 240mm close focus again:

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/im ... iginal.jpg
This lens has some really good qualities, considering it is not even mounted correctly and is definitely not correctly set up for register, which alters the way the zoom/focus correction functions.
David