Article on A900

Specifically for the discussion of the A-mount DSLR range
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Article on A900

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Mark K
Grand Caliph
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:10 pm

Re: Article on A900

Unread post by Mark K »

thanks for sharing. Nothing new indeed.
NevHi
Heirophant
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 10:45 am
Location: NZ

Re: Article on A900

Unread post by NevHi »

Sony DSLR-A900 Alpha 900 digital SLR
Looks great on paper
By George Cole • 2nd March 2009 13:08 GMT
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/03/02 ... shot_a900/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Reviewer using a non full frame lens is not a good look.

There are quite a few uninformed comments to this article
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/03/02 ... /comments/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
5D, 8000i, XD7
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: Article on A900

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

I'm not sure whether the "16-105" detail is an error or not...seems to be wearing a Zeiss 16-35 in their product images and many of their test images as well.
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
NevHi
Heirophant
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 10:45 am
Location: NZ

Re: Article on A900

Unread post by NevHi »

They look like standard stock SONY publicity photo's to me.
5D, 8000i, XD7
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests