old freind

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

old freind

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

this old chap kindly sat for me one evening some years ago, i took a few different angles but decided on this one.

mikehawthorne
Attachments
old freind.jpg
(204.86 KiB) Downloaded 453 times
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: old freind

Unread post by Dusty »

Good capture, Mike. The face shows that the years have worn on him, but not yet worn him down!

Dusty
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: old freind

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

I second Dusty, but you need better lighting imho.
I mean the lighting here is probably a flash from the top of the DSLR.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: old freind

Unread post by aster »

Good potrait Mike,

Thanks for sharing,

Yildiz
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: old freind

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I't doesn't look much like camera flash too me I'm afraid, there's a shadow on the front left of the face that shouldn't be that deep if a camera mounted flash was used for main light, there is strong light coming from his left quarter, and a more diffuse light coming from his right both working to produce that shadow.. so there is at least two separate light sources (whatever they were), but it doesn't matter all that much as the detail is very good.
So I'd class it as a good portrait, (from a very occasional portrait shooter's perspective, that is). In any case you could discuss portraiture till the cows came home about the 'right' way to do it but in the end a portrait is the result of how that particular portrait was shot and therefore one could argue, correct for 'that' shot, (such is artistic licence, eye of the beholder etc.), whether everyone likes it or not is another matter, i'd say if the person being taken is ok with it, it's a winner.
Greg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests