Flowers 2010

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

White Hibiscus (it sure reminds me something :wink: )
Image
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Dusty »

A very nice Hibiscus indeed, Doc. Details? I find no EXIF info.

Dusty
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by aster »

Indeed a nice white Hibiscus, Dr. Harout.

The white and pink combination also is very elegant.

Yildiz
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by aster »

An earlier shot from past week but seems there's no escape from glare from the brightness of the sky.. : )

Butterfly Bush flower
ButterflyBush 5.jpg
(220.61 KiB) Downloaded 1467 times
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Dusty wrote:A very nice Hibiscus indeed, Doc. Details? I find no EXIF info.

Dusty
# Sony DT-16-105/3.5-5.6
# ISO Speed Ratings = 400
# Original Date/Time = 2010:07:01 19:20:47
# Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/160 second
# Aperture = ƒ/7.1
# Focal Length = 105 mm
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Pretty sharp for f7.1 Doc, good detail on the stamens, I don't think I've ever seen a white Hibiscus before, good one.
Ah now I can see that orange centre better on the smal violet flowers Yildiz, thanks for that, couldn't quite see it properly before, a very striking colour combination and nice looking flower arrangement, no wonder you have that one in the garden :-)
Greg
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by aster »

Greg Beetham wrote:Ah now I can see that orange centre better on the smal violet flowers Yildiz, thanks for that, couldn't quite see it properly before, a very striking colour combination and nice looking flower arrangement, no wonder you have that one in the garden :-)
Greg
Hi Greg, :D

If weather and light should be permissive, I can take better shots of the Butterfly Bush flower. These were taken during some bright moments, I have to say and the background is a bit distracting as you pointed out earlier.

I love unsual colour combinations and interesting formations and flowers and of course plants are wonderful sources for inspiration.

Thanks, : ))

Yildiz

Here's one from an earlier week; an Agapanthus about to bloom and take the form of a global flower head.
Agapanthus.jpg
(174.39 KiB) Downloaded 1459 times
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by aster »

A couple from early this evening, around 17:30 hrs.

Yildiz

Nerium oleander
Nerium oleander.jpg
(193.43 KiB) Downloaded 1438 times
Rose
Rose.jpg
(130.64 KiB) Downloaded 1456 times

Edit: the name of the first flower was corrected to Nerium oleander as Greg pointed out the difference in the species. Thanks, Greg! : )
Last edited by aster on Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
ACIPhotos
Heirophant
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Plymouth Devon
Contact:

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by ACIPhotos »

Hi all - I'm new to this forum but thought I could show my my photo of a bluebell coming into bud. A few weeks old now of course but I'm stilll quite proud of it. Taken on my A350 with a Tamron 90mm macro lens. I've just got to work out how to!!....I think I have it.... I'd love some feedback please.
Attachments
DSC07534.jpg
DSC07534.jpg (155.9 KiB) Viewed 3430 times
Anna
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Birma »

Fantastic flower pictures over the last week - great stuff :D The last three of yours, Yildiz, have great colour and detail. Great to see the Doc is back as well :D

Anna, interesting to see a Bluebell in bud - not something I've seen photographed much. Lovely bokeh. It would be interesting, from a botanical view, to see the tip of the stem, but this shouldn't affect what is in effect a portrait. I find it difficult to judge what should be in focus and what is acceptable blurred, and I suspect this varies from viewer to viewer as the focus tells the story of the picture in this sort of shot for me. I'm undecided on this one. Looking forward to seeing more from the Tamron 90mm.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Dusty »

How about some wet flowers? All from my now blooming Morning Glories.
DSC07004W.jpg
(96.41 KiB) Downloaded 1447 times
DSC07007W.jpg
(106.02 KiB) Downloaded 1447 times
DSC07001W.jpg
(108.29 KiB) Downloaded 1447 times
Dusty
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Dusty »

And a few more wet ones. Maybe I should post these in the weather today topic - it sure is wet here!
DSC07000W.jpg
(124.03 KiB) Downloaded 1446 times
DSC07010w.jpg
(104.35 KiB) Downloaded 1446 times
With all of these I'm a bit disappointed that the centers are blown out. There's just not enough range to get them in and not kill the texture of the flower. Maybe if I learn more PP skills, I can figure out how to fix that.

Dusty
hercules
Acolyte
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:58 am

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by hercules »

Hello,
Dusty wrote: With all of these I'm a bit disappointed that the centers are blown out. There's just not enough range to get them in and not kill the texture of the flower. Maybe if I learn more PP skills, I can figure out how to fix that.
Dusty
Nice pictures you made here. I don't know if you are a lightroom user, but you could fix the centers easily with the tool for local adjustment, and use it to reduce the exposure.

Nice pictures of the other people too!
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Oo I could be wrong but that one looks more like an Oleander variety (with those long slender leaves) than a Desert Rose Yildiz, we've got both in the yard here, the Oleander does flower well most of the time, but I think the Desert Rose has the prettier flower of the two. I like the genuine rose as well, still one of the nicest flowers devised by Mother nature. :)
Greg

ps. The first pic is one of the Desert Roses, (I was experimenting with getting remote sync with a non digital Metz45 at the time)
Attachments
Pct0233.jpg
Pct0233.jpg (83.28 KiB) Viewed 3416 times
DSC01246-copy.jpg
DSC01246-copy.jpg (97.31 KiB) Viewed 3416 times
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Flowers 2010

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Dusty I think the centres are more just out of DOF range than anything, mostly, on a few there is a bit of overexposure of the centres as well I guess. You could experiment with exposing more for the centre if you wanted too, I'd be inclined too maybe stop down more at minus 1/3-2/3, maybe go back another couple or few paces and either zoom in a bit for the pic or crop afterwards, whatever works best, pretty flowers though.
Greg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests