Dr. Harout wrote:Wonderful, very brilliant and astonishingly beautiful pictures we have here.
Yildiz, your pictures are really standing out. May I guess you're using new techniques in PP?
Thank you, Dr. Harout.

Very kind of you!
I try to keep my workflow very simple and try to leave very little to post-processing. If the shot is not good out of the camera, all the adjustments made can look very unnatural on the end-product.
Here's my shooting mentality:
* Find a subject that's worthy of shooting.
* Study the subject and the light conditions and the angles it can provide.
* Decide how much DoF I prefer for that certain frame to isolate it from the background.
* Leave the ISO at 100 except for welcome intruders like bees, ants. i.e. moving little subjects.
* I make sure the photo is underexposed by -0.7 or -1, because I use all the data registered in the raw file to regain as much of the photo as I prefer for exposure rate. It's easier than overexposing and risking losing valuable details and depths.
* I use IDC as my main RAW converter and for the final look of my photo, then I crop or resize the photo in Photoshop, apply sharpening, rename it and save.
When the subject is good and the in-camera settings are well-adjusted, the PP takes mere seconds.
If a subject is not good or the exposures went wrong, sometimes I don't even try to PP because it never looks right.
I hope I was able to get my thinking across. : )
Thank you profusely for the complements.
Yildiz
The EXIF of the Dahlia shot.