24-105 vs 28-105

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Lonnie Utah
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Lonnie Utah »

A local seller is selling an old 700si for a crazy low price. He has one pretty awful pic posted. From the look of it, it's either a 28-105 f3.5-4.5 or a 24-105 f3.5-4.5. I could care less about the body, I'm interested in the lens.

Image

Any clues as to what this is? Which lens would you rather have and why?

Regardless, I am going to pick it up on friday if it's still around (the price is that good).

Thanks in advance,
L
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Dusty »

It looks just like my 28-105, with one exception - the distance scale window looks to be slightly wider.

Dusty
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Javelin »

ya 28-105 without the hood and some filter on it
Lonnie Utah
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Lonnie Utah »

What would/did you guys pay for it? ;)
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Javelin »

my 28-105 was 100cdn in mint condition I got it to use as a more portable alternative to my 28-135, I still like what I get from the 28-135 better but the MFD on the 28-105 makes it a lot more convenient.
Old Hydro
Initiate
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:09 am

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Old Hydro »

Lonnie Utah wrote:What would/did you guys pay for it? ;)

A few weeks ago I paid $160 for a new in the box 28-85, and $180 for a new in the 24-85. -- I wanted to try them, before I decide which one to sell and which one to keep.

Used ones have priced all over the board. I've seen them go for $80 up. Some on ebay are trying to sell used ones for $200.

-- I think the 28-85 is a little sharper, and the pictures seem to have a tiny bit more color saturation. It seems to be identical to what I get with a 28-135, that I bought back around 1988.
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

I have in my collection identical RS last series 28-105mm and 24-85mm. It's a hard call as to which is better, but both are better than the 24-105mm which I disposed of. I use the 24-85mm mostly. I also have a 28-75mm KM and a 24-200mm Tokina, and really, the herd should be thinned a bit...

David
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

I'm just curious... any opinion how the 35-105mm stacks against these two?
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
Lonnie Utah
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: 24-105 vs 28-105

Unread post by Lonnie Utah »

The lens in now in my posession. As correctly guess by many it was the 28-105. I got it and a 700si body (which is pretty nice really) for, (are you ready?) $30 USD (£19). Not too shabby. There is one tiny place where it looks like the coating on the front element is scratched. It's not near the center of the lens and I can't seem to make it have any effect. For what I paid, no big deal.

Will be messing around with it for the next few weeks and days to see how I like it...

Thanks all for your help.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests