17-35mm at 35mm

Specifically for the discussion of the A-mount DSLR range
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

17-35mm at 35mm

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

Having posted lots of 17mm pix, a 35mm one to show just how extremely correct the geometry is, and how good the sharpness is, at 35mm:

Image

pBase original full size:

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/image/103399088

David
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: 17-35mm at 35mm

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I know it's a nuisance carrying two cameras but it would be really interesting to have had the A700 with the 18-250 set at 24mm (or a zoom lens that can be set at 24mm and is good at that setting) there for that shot and be able too compare them afterwards, that shot looks awsome for detail.
Greg
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 17-35mm at 35mm

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

A 'Health and Beauty Salon'... nice. But just look at the door and windows, they are locked. Details are great. So which is to be "blamed", A900 or Minolta 17-35 ?

BTW, I notice you have the same problem there: people throwing cigarette tips on the floor. :wink: (nice as details, but bad for general health).
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: 17-35mm at 35mm

Unread post by aster »

Hi David,

I just wish to thank you for the hard work you put into testing the eligible lenses for the A900. Looks like Minolta is in the lead with better results and the latest samples at your gallery give away a lot about the quality of the images in relation to the lens used.

The ducks in flight panaroma and 70-300mm G's fisherman with the fishing line visible is interesting to study and enjoy. I hope the final production Sony or Carl-Zeiss lenses do better as they make their true debut into market.

Thanks for all the info and effort, :D
Yildiz
User avatar
Jonathan K
Oligarch
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:30 pm

Re: 17-35mm at 35mm

Unread post by Jonathan K »

Well I suppose the A900's AF correction will also help a lot... I never felt I could get a picture like that from my 17-35, mostly because the focus would fail in 9 out of 10 cases... Even after BF adjustment, the 7D did not focus correctly and all pictures were kind of unsatisfactory... One more reason why I didn't use it too much.
I didn't send my A700 for BF adjustment yet, since the german cashback programme is unbelievably slow and they didn't refund yet... So I don't have my bill to send along.

This is a total different league and could very well be one argument to start thinking about FF in general or the A900 in particular, which I have carefully avoided so far (except the enthusiasm for a new flagship camera..). Of course my sample could be less good than yours...

Jonathan
Please feel free to visit my gallery:

http://picasaweb.google.com/jonathankaell
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests