Feel free to add why either way.
Would you accept a translucent A700 replacement (EVF) if there isn't an OVF model available to buy?
Exactly my sentiments. I sold my Sony R1 because of the poor performance of the EVF.Dr. Harout wrote:Was against EVF previously, but that due to poor EVFs of the past. But now I don't mind it at all.
Even would prefer EVF for APS-C and OVF for FF, but not for me to decide.
Maybe it is even better for a deteriorating/weakening eyesight.
That all depends upon just what those discounts are and what else is around by then, for me. Maybe my wife would like it, but a I don't think I ever will. If they last 3 years on the market, maybe Sony will be dumping them for $600 -700, body only. But then again the next gen EVF may have an HD EVF, and would you want the A77 then, or would you wait for THAT one to drop?Birma wrote:I would (will?) buy an A7xx with EVF, but I will not be an early adopter - I'll be waiting for the end-of-life discounts
.
Another possibility is that Sony comes out with an OVF A7xx and an EVF A7x, but the A7xx OVF has been degraded so that it is not even as good as the A700, much less better. Then when people don't snap it up it will prove that people want an EVF.Greg Beetham wrote:And that's the rub, if the A7x comes out and is the only one available naturally people will buy it in preference to a non existant A7xx, and that in turn makes the appearance of the A7xx even more unlikely, i.e. a self fulfilling prophecy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests