Macro 2012

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by sury »

From our front yard....

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsu ... .jpg[/img]
DSC14534 by BigSury, on Flickr[/url]
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
mvanrheenen

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

Lots of DOF there sury, gives that nice dreamy look to the flower. Beautiful flower too!
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by Birma »

Yea - I really like the dof on that one Sury. Very nice picture :)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
DennisG

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by DennisG »

My first attempt at a spiderweb
handheld a65 with sigma 70-300 in macromode
DSC00184-2.jpg
DSC00184-2.jpg (203.39 KiB) Viewed 3410 times
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by sury »

Dennis,
Very nice. I love the bokeh and lighting.
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by Birma »

sury wrote:Dennis,
Very nice. I love the bokeh and lighting.
+1 - great colours
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
mvanrheenen

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

DennisG wrote:My first attempt at a spiderweb
For a human you created a very nice web :lol:

Just kidding. I agree with the gents above. It prety hard getting a macro shot focussed with the shallow DOF when shooting macro handheld. You did well.

Mark
DennisG

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by DennisG »

Thanx for the lovely comments :)

here are some of todays "harvest" also handheld with 70-300
DSC00246.jpg
DSC00246.jpg (185.18 KiB) Viewed 3381 times
DSC00250.jpg
DSC00250.jpg (136.75 KiB) Viewed 3381 times
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by sury »

Wow!!!

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by Birma »

Nice one Dennis - the shallow dof seems to work best in the first one for me - both great shots though :)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
mvanrheenen

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

Great macro's indeed, especially with the thin DOF. You did unfortunately lose sharpness and some detail in both, which is the real power of (near) 1:1 macro shots.

Mark
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by sury »

Macro with Tamron 60/f2 on A700. Stacked 24 images using Zerene stacker, outdoors, natural light.

Sury


[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsu ... .jpg[/img]
2012-05-08-08.33.38 ZS PMax738761 by BigSury, on Flickr[/url]
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by Birma »

Wow Sury - you're getting that stacking business well sorted out :) (I love the buttery smooth background as well!)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
mvanrheenen

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

I agree with Birma. Just curious Sury, but what it the green halo on the right side of the flower?

Mark
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Macro 2012

Unread post by sury »

Mark,
Thank you.
That green halo is buds behind the flower that are just coming into focus. If continued for another 10-15 shots, they would
have appeared sharp in focus. I could redo by removing last couple of shots and see if that goes away or at least retouch it
with a shot that is couple behind in the sequence. I enjoy watching the image develop on Zerene Stacker. There is a box to check
that says observe as adjusted which I find very educational when I see something going awry after a shot. Hope that answers your question.

With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests