Birds 2012

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
mvanrheenen

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

Thanks both!

(Welcome back, Greg :D)
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Aw shucks...thanks Yildiz and Mark. :D
Greg
User avatar
Juanito200
Viceroy
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Juanito200 »

Continued avian awesomeness! My entry from today is but a humble pair of dove on my fence. I'm jealous that Mark is always to capture the birds singing. Mine just seem to hang around watching me photograph them!
Attachments
Doves.jpg
(188.42 KiB) Downloaded 1383 times
If the last thing you remember hearing is somebody yelling 'CLEAR!!!', assume you've had a problem!!
a77, a700, a200, Minolta 8000i, NEX C3, NEX 5N and more lenses than my wife suspects!
mvanrheenen

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

John, you have no idea how much effort it takes and how lucky I am catching those singing birds :lol: I tend to go out walking for up to about 6 hours a week, mostly over 2 days and have 3 images on average to show for it. No good return on investment ;)

Great image of those doves! I looks like they're walking after each other on the small edge of the fence, a bit like a train :) I tried identifying them and I think these are Mourning Doves (Zenaida macroura). Bit of a sad name for these birds.

Mark
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I like doves, poor little blighters, they are so inoffensive they wouldn’t hurt a fly, but they tend to be the mullet of the sky, the favourite meal of many a raptor, it’s no wonder that they tend to be a little on the suspicious side in general demeanour.
Actually not a bad shot John, I don’t think we have that particular one here.
Greg
Ps Yes that sounds about right Mark lots of effort and a few keepers now and then, what we need is a freezing ray to lock em down for a minute or two ha ha.
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Birma »

Really like the hiding Pheasant and the singing Black Cap Mark :)

Nice pair of Doves John :)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
mvanrheenen

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

Thanks Andy.
Argonaut
Oligarch
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:59 pm

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Argonaut »

Tanzania marches on: the starlings in Africa are stunning, especially if all you have in the States is the Common Starling. The Superb Starling is quite common where we were, and often was the picnic pest bird - can't beat that. a580, Sigma 400, 1/400, f8, ISO 800.

Verreaux's Eagle Owls were also seen several times, but this time we got a pair, and with a certain amount of coaxing from Lightroom, they became visible. This is a close relative of and similar in size to our Great Horned Owl. a580, Sigma 400, 1/1600, f5.6, ISO 800.

Tawny Eagles are, again, fairly common. Good flight shots aren't - one of these guys (?) was perched on a dead stick and I was tracking another coming in. The second one (on the right) displaced the first on the stick. Because it was a BIF shot I had the shutter speed turned way up and the motor drive on. And then it all came together. It was just one of those days. a580, Sigma 400, 1/4000, f8, ISO 800.
047_Tawny Eagle (Aquila rapax)_120225_DSC01210_a580.jpg
(194.71 KiB) Downloaded 1341 times
Sony a77ii, RX-100 I; RX10 iii; Rokinon 8mm f/3.5; Tamron 17-50; Sony 70-400G; Lightroom 6.2; Photoshop CS5; PicturesToExe 8.0.
mvanrheenen

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by mvanrheenen »

I can see why the species is called Superb Starlings!

I never captured owls before. That's a shame because it seems to be a very rewarding experience! Great eagles you captured, what a crystal clear, sharp image!

Mark
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Birma »

More great Tanzanians Argonaut :) That Starling has a very severe stare, and the eagle shot is stunning - great detail of the wing feathers.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Too much great shots, as I notice, after a 10 day holiday.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Argonaut
Oligarch
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:59 pm

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Argonaut »

Thanks for the comments! If I have learned one thing, it is (and I saw this in another article the other day) that shutter speed is more important than anything else in getting a sharp photo, hand-held. The article advised using a rule of 3x focal length (e.g. 1/1200 for a 400mm) instead of the traditional 1x focal length. For me the quality of the lens is lost if the shutter speed is too low. It's more important than the DOF you get from stopping down. Even with steady-shot!! And now that we have these great sensors, we can shoot at ISO 800 or 1600 and use those high shutter speeds. I used to shoot Ektachrome 200 - can't imagine going back to ISO 200 for wildlife.
Sony a77ii, RX-100 I; RX10 iii; Rokinon 8mm f/3.5; Tamron 17-50; Sony 70-400G; Lightroom 6.2; Photoshop CS5; PicturesToExe 8.0.
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by sury »

Great pictures Argonaut. Thank you for the pointers as well. I am inspired to give it a try with 3x the focal length using my Tamron 200-500
this weekend. These days I am venturing into using even iso 1600 with decent images. Once again thank you for sharing that insight.

With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Juanito200
Viceroy
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Juanito200 »

Mark- Not much return on investment, but definitely a beautiful return.. I lack the patience for that, as I am a casual birder... I'm heading to Big Bend National Park at the end of the month, and I am putting bird photography on my to do list... We'll see what happens! :wink:
Argonaut- that is a stunning series!
If the last thing you remember hearing is somebody yelling 'CLEAR!!!', assume you've had a problem!!
a77, a700, a200, Minolta 8000i, NEX C3, NEX 5N and more lenses than my wife suspects!
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Birds 2012

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Wow that's some Starling variety Argonaut and it sure has an intense stare like Birma said. Great Owls and Eagles too, I agree we suffered extreme hardships back in the film days trying to get good photos while being limited with ISO and shutter speeds, but it was still fun trying and those rare times when one achieved a decent photo was appreciated all the more I think.
Greg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests