maldives

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

maldives

Unread post by kingfisher »

three months ago i was on the maldive`s
very nice place
it`s paradise , the eilands are close the equator , so the sun is very strong , so it`s difficult ta take picture`s of white beach`s
here `n impression of this trip

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

all the picture`s is taken with the SONY A700 and the MINOLTA 17-35 2,8 - 4

greatings
gustav
User avatar
RobbieA
Oligarch
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: South Africa

Re: maldives

Unread post by RobbieA »

Wonderful colours! Would make perfect postcards. Thank you for sharing and don't stop now.
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: maldives

Unread post by Javelin »

I see the tidal wave hasn't hurt the beauty of the place. Very nice pictures
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: maldives

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Excellent pictures Gustav. Thanks for sharing. :D
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
bonneville
Grand Caliph
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:24 pm
Location: Rutland (smallest UK county 50% of the time!)

Re: maldives

Unread post by bonneville »

The now called "Maldives" used to be the home of a Royal Air Force base on Gan, and when I flew out to Singapore as a young buck of some seventeen summers in 1965 we landed there in a four prop Brittannia aircraft. I can still remember as we decended looking out of the tiny window and I all I could see was the sea. Honestly thought I was going to meet my maker, but instead I met paradise :D

Oh, and if Photoclubalpha forum decides to stage member's competitions kingfisher, you are not eligible 'cos you are far too good and it simply wouldn't be fair on us mortals :lol:
Links to my: Flickr Blog Twitter
User avatar
bossel
Viceroy
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: France, Côte d'Azur

Re: maldives

Unread post by bossel »

I am getting jeaulous. These pics are beautiful!!
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

Re: maldives

Unread post by kingfisher »

thanks everyone

here i have another three picture`s

picture one and two , is with the minolta 17-35 lens

number three , the lizard , with the SAL70/200 2,8 SSM

Image

Image

Image


gustav
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: maldives

Unread post by Javelin »

Gustav you have a talent of getting the best colour and sharpness that is possible out of a scene. please tell me you spent hours and hours on PP on these shots?
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: maldives

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Javelin wrote:Gustav you have a talent of getting the best colour and sharpness that is possible out of a scene. please tell me you spent hours and hours on PP on these shots?
And that question goes from me too.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
hanafinoor
Acolyte
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: maldives

Unread post by hanafinoor »

Wow.....thats splendid.
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

Re: maldives

Unread post by kingfisher »

the left foot off the lizard is not sharp , but thats normal if you taken this shot at 2.8 than you have a little place off sharpness
his left foot , is not ugly plastic , it`s only not sharp , the lizard has a length of fifteen centimetre , so the picture is a big crop

greatings
gustav
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: maldives

Unread post by Javelin »

Waters kinda muddy though.... ick
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

Re: maldives

Unread post by kingfisher »

i think i now the problem

i look at the original , and you can see below his leeft feet , a hole in the tree , in the hole there is white
round the hole it`s wet , i think it`s a kind of resin
i started with my picture`s in LIGHTROOM , than i opened in ELEMENTS
when i open the picture in ADOBE ELEMENTS 6 , i have a plug in , for put out noise , when i do that , the place where there is resin its blurred and shiny

sorry for my bad english i can better speak it than whrite it , dfficult words i must look for , on translation site`s
and almost every word is difficult for me :) :) :) :)

but if i do this a hole year , my letters shall be better.....i hope
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: maldives

Unread post by Javelin »

It does look like it's a smoother area on the branch where something has taken away the sharp features on the bark. but the subject is so strong in that picture i'm surprised anyone would notice it until it's pointed out.
kingfisher wrote:i think i now the problem

i look at the original , and you can see below his leeft feet , a hole in the tree , in the hole there is white
round the hole it`s wet , i think it`s a kind of resin
i started with my picture`s in LIGHTROOM , than i opened in ELEMENTS
when i open the picture in ADOBE ELEMENTS 6 , i have a plug in , for put out noise , when i do that , the place where there is resin its blurred and shiny

sorry for my bad english i can better speak it than whrite it , dfficult words i must look for , on translation site`s
and almost every word is difficult for me :) :) :) :)

but if i do this a hole year , my letters shall be better.....i hope
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: maldives

Unread post by pakodominguez »

Don't the 70~200 2.8 have a wierd bokeh when focusing close up?
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests