Why does WB matter when raw shooting ?

Specifically for the discussion of the A-mount DSLR range
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
braeside
Grand Caliph
Posts: 281
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Kingdom of Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Why does WB matter when raw shooting ?

Unread post by braeside »

You are missing the snow in the borders tonight David. :lol:
David
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Why does WB matter when raw shooting ?

Unread post by pakodominguez »

David Kilpatrick wrote: I can tell you for sure than using an 80B blue filter and daylight WB gives 1 to 1.5 stops more highlight clipping adjustment than using AWB, with all KM/Sony cameras to date. I use 80B/tungsten and it works.
With Tungsten and Fluorescent lights, right?
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
alphaPDX
Heirophant
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:53 pm
Contact:

WB + raw surprise

Unread post by alphaPDX »

I was caught off guard when my A200 slowed down while shooting RAW recently. Turned out I had left WB-Bracket on from shooting jpgs earlier in the day, and it applied same to three RAWs at a time. That really times out the A200 in a hurry! I was surprised by that setting not being overwritten when shooting RAW, but will now consider it a 'feature' & read my back panel a bit more carefully in the future.. :o
Jim R, Oregon -- a200 + lenses & stuff
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Why does WB matter when raw shooting ?

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

pakodominguez wrote:
David Kilpatrick wrote: I can tell you for sure than using an 80B blue filter and daylight WB gives 1 to 1.5 stops more highlight clipping adjustment than using AWB, with all KM/Sony cameras to date. I use 80B/tungsten and it works.
With Tungsten and Fluorescent lights, right?
I have not tried a fluorescent correction filter, since there are so many types and you need one exactly matched to the lights in use. I only use the 80B when shooting by tungsten light (normally tungsten halogen or Halostar modelling lamps) and only in the studio; for any quick shots 'in the field' I just use preset or auto white balance. For fluorescent light, or energy-saver bulbs, I use AWB (the preset is very rarely correct, because it applies only to one type of fluorescent light). If you want precision correction for various types of light, Singh-Ray used to make such filters; you could correct for anything from mercury vapour to named types of building floodlighting.

David
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests