I saw this posted on another forum. It is in German, but several people say it is well done.
http://www.photoscala.de/Artikel/Flaggs ... -Vergleich
Those of you who read German might consider commenting.
A900, D3x, 1DsIII comparison test
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
- bfitzgerald
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm
Re: A900, D3x, 1DsIII comparison test
Well it came across as expected. He liked something about all 3 cameras. The usual Sony not so good high ISO was in there.
He wants the handling of the sony, the colour of the canon, and the lens of the nikon!
Interesting he liked the Ektar 100 too, and said it looked nicer than the digital shots (aka clock)
He wants the handling of the sony, the colour of the canon, and the lens of the nikon!
Interesting he liked the Ektar 100 too, and said it looked nicer than the digital shots (aka clock)
Re: A900, D3x, 1DsIII comparison test
I think David's post awhile back concerning A900/D3x high ISO is quite good:bfitzgerald wrote:Well it came across as expected. He liked something about all 3 cameras. The usual Sony not so good high ISO was in there.
http://www.photoclubalpha.com/forum/vie ... 109#p21109
Bakubo http://www.bakubo.com
Re: A900, D3x, 1DsIII comparison test
The high iso shot coming from the D3x looks black and white. If you remove the colour noise in the A900 I think they would be pretty close, no?
Flickr - Sony A100, Sony A700 - SAL50F14, SAL16105, SAL1870, Minolta 35-70 F4, Minolta 70-210 F4, Tamron 90 F2.8 Macro
Re: A900, D3x, 1DsIII comparison test
According to the author of the test, out of the three 'flagships' Canon EOS 1Ds Mk III, Nikon D3X, and Sony Alpha 900, at low speed settings (ISO 100/21° - ISO 200/24°) the Sony's image quality is the best---which is particularly notable with regard to the price. The Sony also is the smallest, lightest, and easiest of the three cameras to handle. At higher ISO speeds, the Canon's image quality is the best. At ISO 400/27° - ISO 800/30°, the Sony's is acceptable; at ISO 1600/33° and higher it's the worst by a wide margin ("disappointing," says the author). Kodak Ektar 100 35-mm film lags far behind them all in terms of noise and sharpness but still is really strong in terms of colour rendition and colour discrimination.bakubo wrote:http://www.photoscala.de/Artikel/Flaggs ... -Vergleich
Those of you who read German might consider commenting.
At first sight, among the three 24-70 mm 1:2.8 lenses the Nikkor looks best ... but that's due to the camera's sophisticated electronic lens fault correction. Without correction, the SAL 24-70 mm ZA is the best. In the end, all cameras have their strengths and their weaknesses ... as always.
-- Olaf
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests