I'll give Sony some credit..

Anything else you want to get off your chest or any public chat you want to continue away from a main topic
User avatar
bfitzgerald
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm

I'll give Sony some credit..

Unread post by bfitzgerald »

At least they had the brains and sense to use SD and MS, rather than their own memory format.
Clearly this signals that someone is earning their pay cheque, even if they made a style of camera that does not appeal to me. :P
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: I'll give Sony some credit..

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Well, MS is their own memory format actually, there isn't actually anything wrong with MS per se except that it was not adopted widely in the industry, maybe Sony wanted to charge too much, who knows, there was a lot of collaboration with Sandisk in the development of MS Pro and Duo etc...apparently. The reason why Minolta chose CF for their DSLR cameras (so I've read elsewhere) was at the time it had one of the highest write speeds around...not sure how it compares now though with SD and MS etc.
Greg
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: I'll give Sony some credit..

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

Sometimes I wonder if they offer the MS slot in order to sell cards or sell cameras. If the MS memory format were significantly more competitive than SD, either in price, speed, or reliability, then they might be an exclusive advantage of the Sony system. Thus, the format would contribute to selling the cameras.

Certainly, however, it is an advantage for the new cameras that they can hold two cards and switch between them easily--in this case the cameras sell the format.
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests