Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
jbtaylor wrote:A lesser traveled portion of Acadia National Park is captured with the a99 and the ZA 24mm f 2.0.
Nice photos! Thanks for posting. I hope to someday visit Acadia.
That last one reminds me a bit of a photo I took in 1986 at Point Lobos State Natural Reserve in California on a foggy morning. I don't do much landscape photography because it just isn't a primary interest for me. But, of course, I do take some when I am in beautiful places.
My kind of landscapes; beautiful rock formations meeting the ocean waves, the mist blending into the woods. There's even a sense of melancholy to the scenery, accented with the isolated environment. Just so neat.
24mm was fine. Some of those shots are with the RX1 which is 35mm. The landscape is so big and your ability to get close minimizes the need for a wider focal length. Your mileage may vary.
Given that you would have to fly to get there, taking only the right gear is a must. The ZA 24-70mm is probably ideal for that place but given the chance to get close to wildlife, a 70-200mm would also be required. Anything longer or shorter would be a luxury. I did meet a photojournalist that was sporting an a7 something and the new G Master 24-70mm. He was loving it but it was too short for the whale watching cruise that we were sharing.