Alpha on Amazon

Subscribe to Cameracraft

Cameracraft is one of the highest quality photo enthusiast magazines you'll find - worldwide. Our Photoclubalpha subscription deal is £4.80 less (UK) than the current discounted offer - it's the lowest cost you can get. The cost will be held for three years and you can cancel at any time. Visit our web pages to see the regular deals, or subscribe below.

Postal Region

Photoclubalpha Forum

Join our free Forum for a wealth of info, great company and some fantastic photo sharing threads! Registration on the Forum is separate from Registration on the website, but you are allowed to register using the same name and password.
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Old camera appreciation! April 12, 2021
    I like this thread! Yildiz, nice photo! I want to visit Turkey again!Here are a few I took with my KM 7D + Sigma 18-125mm f3.5-5.6 while traveling in Europe for a few weeks in 2005 using a Eurail pass.Verona, ItalyMarktplatz, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, GermanyVienna, AustriaOffering me a 2 for 1 in Amsterdam? Statistics: […]
  • Alpha A-mount System • Re: Olympus is out... April 12, 2021
    Here is a new interview posted today. We shall see how things play out.Interview: Aki Murata of OMDS (Olympus) - 'we’re more flexible now'// ... exible-nowEditor's note: Barnaby BrittonFor all of the doom and gloom in comments and even some editorial coverage (not, I hasten to add, on DPReview) it seems that the team at […]
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Looking Back April 12, 2021
    More color isn't a bad thing in this context.JTStatistics: Posted by jbtaylor — Mon Apr 12, 2021 10:18 pm
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread! April 12, 2021
    Thank you!Yildiz.These Gift files can be made in the latest Photoshop element from any photo. To get the best effect later, it takes some time to load the entire Gift file. Better yet, click on the picture and open it in full screen mode. Statistics: Posted by ValeryD — Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:02 pm
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Old camera appreciation! April 12, 2021
    .Indeed very colourful, Sury.20 September 2007 - 10:56 am I was at Topkapi Palace on the historical peninsula and this view is of Karaköy District that accommodates historic Galata Tower and many other historic buildings.Sony DSC-V3Yildiz.Statistics: Posted by aster — Mon Apr 12, 2021 8:01 pm

Past Article Calendar

June 2008

Megapixels and perceived detail

Increases in pixel count are often dismissed because to ‘double’ the resolution of a 6 megapixel sensor you would need 24 megapixels. Indeed, to double it linearly you would – but the human eye judges density of detail on an area basis.

It is easy to demonstrate, and I did so a long time ago when people said the 10 megapixels of the A100 was not worth the step up from the 6 megapixels of the Dynax 7D/5D. Here is the diagram I used to show the actual difference:

To the left, you have the density of a 10.2 megapixel sensor, compared to the density of a 6.1 megapixel sensor on the right. In area terms, it’s a 67% increase in the density of textural detail – in the amount of information available for the brain to interpret the image.

The step from 10.2 to 14.2 megapixels is less dramatic – just a 40% increase – but nevertheless significant. The brain can not interpret a flat 2D image as having depth, so we read the same clues that the brain uses in real life alongside stereo vision to judge shape, depth, and movement. The most important monocular clue we process is familiar textural detail, and the way it reduces in scale with distance.

This isn’t new science; it was one of the discoveries of the Renaissance along with other tricks such as aerial perspective (lightening and desaturating of the colours into the distance). It helped great painters to make their flat canvas look three-dimensional.

One of the complaints about early digital photography, and about cameras which processed digital noise too heavily, was that fine textures were lost or quantised (a pixel-frequency based pattern replaced the textures) giving images a ‘plastic’ look and lack of 3D feel.

Just as rollfilm gives more information of this kind than 35mm film, so higher resolution sensors give more information than lower resolution ones. A 14.2 megapixel sensor as found on the Alpha 350 will produce a print with much greater textural information than a 6 or 8 megapixel camera. Depending on the level of smoothing noise reduction, strength of the anti-aliasing filter and other factors (notably lens quality and focus) it may give a better result than a 12 or 10 megapixel camera. It’s very hard to beat a Sony Alpha 100 fitted with a CZ lens for ISO 100 textural information (microcontrast detail)!

But here is how much more you get from a 2008 14.2 megapixel sensor compared to a 2004 6.1 megapixel sensor:

In real terms, the difference in density is precisely the same as that required to make an A3 print, instead of  an A4 print, to a set standard of sharpness and detail. That’s how far we have come between the Konica Minolta 7D and the Sony Alpha 350 – from single page repro to double page spread. Given that double page repro was already possible with care using the 6 megapixel camera (as Photoworld demonstrated) the 14 megapixel camera should be capable of an A2 litho printed poster.

The move to higher pixel densities is not a pointless race. All other things being equal, the higher density image will provide more information to the eye and brain, and yield pictures of the same subjects which look that little bit more realistic.

There is little doubt that the Alpha 350 does not do this ‘out of the box’ when shooting JPEGs as the extended input dynamic range results in a lowering of microcontrast detail, giving the images a slightly flat look despite a decent straight-line section in the transfer curve. The 350 comes into its own when you work from raw files and recover every bit of the available resolution.

– David Kilpatrick

Comments are closed.