some new kingfisherpicture`s

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by kingfisher »

thanks david and yildiz

the detailphoto`s , is piece off the normal picture

dr harout ask me , for some 100% crop-picture , i thought he means a small part off the picture
butt i ask my friend what he`s meaning
now i now...... al the photo`s , except the detail-picture`s are 100 % cropt photo`s

so i make them for the forum only smaller

when i take this picture`s , i make my sharppoint in the camera out off the middle , so the compositie is in one time good

david
thank you for you`s compliment`s
i send some off the picture to paul genge , hope he like them

greatings
gustav
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

That's OK, Gustav.
100% crop = a small part of the picture (up to 1024 pix on one side) without resizing.
Anyway, in the detailed shot I see a perfect sharpness and that's what I was expecting from that lens. Beautiful!
Thanks a lot, Gustav, you are wonderful. :D
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by kingfisher »

hello bossel

i like , that you ask me

when i take this picture`s at 2.8 , 3.2 or 4 the shutterspeed is going faster , so that is good

but the place that is sharp on the picture get smaller , so that means , that the kingfisher has a lot off on-sharpness

if you take this picture`s at two or three meter`s distance , the best depth of field is 5,6 or 6.3 ,
when you take 7.1 or 8 the possibility gets higher that you get restless background

the ideal ISO for the SONY A700 is 200

next sunday i go back to the kingfishers , hopefully with the sony 300 MM , i hire this lens
i hope that someday i have this lens for myself , it is a very great lens , i think the best 300MM THERE IS
only the price here in holland is to much , 5150 pound , in the UK he cost 3600 pound , why the difference
i now that the POUND is going down ( sorry ) but the different , between the price in the netherlands en the UK is to much ( almost 1700 POUNDS )

i think that sony must give everyone on this forum this lens , for making free advertisement :D :D :D :lol: :lol:

greatings
gustav
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

kingfisher wrote: i send some off the picture to paul genge , hope he like them

greatings
gustav
Paul has already mentioned your photos to me, he was very impressed.

David
paulmurphy
Grand Caliph
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Northumberland, United Kingdom

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by paulmurphy »

Stunning pictures of a magnificent subject, a real pleasure to view.

Best wishes

Murph
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I'm with Gustav,
mathimatically speaking if you crop something by 100% you have ZERO left over......What would be a better term would be something like 90% crop.......maybe.
Greg
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Sonolta wrote:
Greg Beetham wrote:I'm with Gustav,
mathimatically speaking if you crop something by 100% you have ZERO left over......What would be a better term would be something like 90% crop.......maybe.
Greg
It's called a 100% crop because it is a crop that contains 100% of the pixels. :roll: :idea:

-Sonolta

PS...You are among the kings of these birds, no doubt about it, kingfisher.
You bet, really excellent stuff, I'd love to have the Australian bird index shot at that quality....might take a few lifetimes though. :(

When I first saw this term (over at DPR a long time ago) I asked then what they meant by cropping a photo by 100% (a paradox), and no one could explain it to me, now that you explain it Don, it's making some sort of sense....at last.
jcoffin
Grand Caliph
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by jcoffin »

Greg Beetham wrote: When I first saw this term (over at DPR a long time ago) I asked then what they meant by cropping a photo by 100% (a paradox), and no one could explain it to me, now that you explain it Don, it's making some sort of sense....at last.
It's the photo at 100% magnification, cropped to a size that allows posting.
MFS
Heirophant
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:08 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by MFS »

They're stunning as usual Gustav and I agree with you about the 300mm give-away. What is 300mm in a lifetime length anyway? Cheers, John
John.

Sony A700 - KMD7D + Grip - HS5600 D and some Minolta Lenses
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by Birma »

Really lovely shots Gustav. Even the branch / perch that the bird is sitting on is in beautiful detail. After I have finished enjoying the glorious plummage, I can then wonder at the moss and lichen. A great Christmas gift to us all at Photoclubalpha :D
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
stevecim
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Australia

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by stevecim »

Top Shots, Gustav

I've only seen kingfishers twice in the wild, never close enough to take a usable photo, even with a 500mm lens I was still to far away to get any detail at all :(

How far was kingfisher from you?

Cheers, Stephen
stevecim
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Australia

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by stevecim »

thanks Don :)
fastson
Heirophant
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:07 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by fastson »

Wonderful shots. Such detail. :shock:
Flickr - Sony A100, Sony A700 - SAL50F14, SAL16105, SAL1870, Minolta 35-70 F4, Minolta 70-210 F4, Tamron 90 F2.8 Macro
User avatar
kingfisher
Oligarch
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:06 am

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Unread post by kingfisher »

-Sonolta

PS...You are among the kings of these birds, no doubt about it, kingfisher.[/quote]


thanks don

gustav
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests