Macro 2012
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Macro 2012
From our front yard....
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsu ... .jpg[/img]
DSC14534 by BigSury, on Flickr[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsu ... .jpg[/img]
DSC14534 by BigSury, on Flickr[/url]
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
mvanrheenen
Re: Macro 2012
Lots of DOF there sury, gives that nice dreamy look to the flower. Beautiful flower too!
Re: Macro 2012
Yea - I really like the dof on that one Sury. Very nice picture 
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
-
DennisG
Re: Macro 2012
My first attempt at a spiderweb
handheld a65 with sigma 70-300 in macromode
handheld a65 with sigma 70-300 in macromode
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Macro 2012
Dennis,
Very nice. I love the bokeh and lighting.
Very nice. I love the bokeh and lighting.
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Re: Macro 2012
+1 - great colourssury wrote:Dennis,
Very nice. I love the bokeh and lighting.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
-
mvanrheenen
Re: Macro 2012
For a human you created a very nice webDennisG wrote:My first attempt at a spiderweb
Just kidding. I agree with the gents above. It prety hard getting a macro shot focussed with the shallow DOF when shooting macro handheld. You did well.
Mark
-
DennisG
Re: Macro 2012
Thanx for the lovely comments 
here are some of todays "harvest" also handheld with 70-300
here are some of todays "harvest" also handheld with 70-300
Re: Macro 2012
Nice one Dennis - the shallow dof seems to work best in the first one for me - both great shots though 
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
-
mvanrheenen
Re: Macro 2012
Great macro's indeed, especially with the thin DOF. You did unfortunately lose sharpness and some detail in both, which is the real power of (near) 1:1 macro shots.
Mark
Mark
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Macro 2012
Macro with Tamron 60/f2 on A700. Stacked 24 images using Zerene stacker, outdoors, natural light.
Sury
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsu ... .jpg[/img]
2012-05-08-08.33.38 ZS PMax738761 by BigSury, on Flickr[/url]
Sury
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigsu ... .jpg[/img]
2012-05-08-08.33.38 ZS PMax738761 by BigSury, on Flickr[/url]
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Re: Macro 2012
Wow Sury - you're getting that stacking business well sorted out
(I love the buttery smooth background as well!)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
-
mvanrheenen
Re: Macro 2012
I agree with Birma. Just curious Sury, but what it the green halo on the right side of the flower?
Mark
Mark
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Macro 2012
Mark,
Thank you.
That green halo is buds behind the flower that are just coming into focus. If continued for another 10-15 shots, they would
have appeared sharp in focus. I could redo by removing last couple of shots and see if that goes away or at least retouch it
with a shot that is couple behind in the sequence. I enjoy watching the image develop on Zerene Stacker. There is a box to check
that says observe as adjusted which I find very educational when I see something going awry after a shot. Hope that answers your question.
With best regards,
Sury
Thank you.
That green halo is buds behind the flower that are just coming into focus. If continued for another 10-15 shots, they would
have appeared sharp in focus. I could redo by removing last couple of shots and see if that goes away or at least retouch it
with a shot that is couple behind in the sequence. I enjoy watching the image develop on Zerene Stacker. There is a box to check
that says observe as adjusted which I find very educational when I see something going awry after a shot. Hope that answers your question.
With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests