Water Shots
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Water Shots
Hi everyone. Not being fab as you are at landscapes I have taken some water shots of the River Dart that I would like to share with you. Any feedback you have would be great as I am always striving to learn. Plus any water shots you have would be great to see too. 
- Attachments
-
- River Dart.jpg (214.21 KiB) Viewed 6700 times
-
- Ripple.jpg (198.65 KiB) Viewed 6700 times
Anna
Re: Water Shots
Hi Anna, interesting shots. I really like the colours relfected in #1 and the sense of movement in #2. Just imho of course, but in both the 'action' is a bit central in the frame - you could try compsoing the shots with the main subject off centre (or on a 'third'?)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: Water Shots
Hi Anna,
#1 just does nothing for me. Maybe it's just too monotonous with all the green, but hey, that's just me.
#2 could stand a bit of stepping/zooming back to show just a bit more context. I do like the smooth flow effect of the water.
Dusty
#1 just does nothing for me. Maybe it's just too monotonous with all the green, but hey, that's just me.
#2 could stand a bit of stepping/zooming back to show just a bit more context. I do like the smooth flow effect of the water.
Dusty
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Water Shots
I don't mind artsy water shots, the content/composure is maybe a little obscure, but the 'keep em guessing' value is quite good I think.
Greg
Greg
Re: Water Shots
Birma wrote:Hi Anna, interesting shots. I really like the colours relfected in #1 and the sense of movement in #2. Just imho of course, but in both the 'action' is a bit central in the frame - you could try compsoing the shots with the main subject off centre (or on a 'third'?)
Ah Yes! That rule of thirds. Bit difficult with a ripple - only because I found it hard enough to get in shot in the first place without missing an edge off. Still that's what I have to practice I guess.
Anna
Re: Water Shots
It's my green phase obviously!Dusty wrote:Hi Anna,
#1 just does nothing for me. Maybe it's just too monotonous with all the green, but hey, that's just me.
#2 could stand a bit of stepping/zooming back to show just a bit more context. I do like the smooth flow effect of the water.
Dusty
Anna
Re: Water Shots
Rules are there to be broken sometimes. If we all did thirds and what the books tell us we'd all get the same view I suppose. Not that I'm trying to be obscure???.....I just take what I see and like the look of. I always was a bit quirky!Greg Beetham wrote:I don't mind artsy water shots, the content/composure is maybe a little obscure, but the 'keep em guessing' value is quite good I think.
Greg
And not having had any feedback on my stuff it's hard to know where you are going wrong sometimes.
Anna
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Water Shots
I didn't mention the rule of thirds actually, I don't think you need to bother too much about rule of thirds in artistic type shots.
The rule of thirds is a crock when it's use is obvious I think, I often see people using it as a matter of underlying principal no matter what, to the point of it being gratuitous...it's as if to say, look I complied with the rule and shoved the important bit over too one side and left a bunch of empty space or uninteresting stuff in the middle and now it's a proper photo.
By 'obscure' I meant those photos are more art than informative pictures, (mainly the first one), as we the audience weren't there too see the surroundings, we can only see the portion you photographed. For example, at first glance the green and blue one with the dimple is not self explanatory at all, I looked at it for some time trying to figure out what it was and what it was supposed too represent and how and where from the green and blue came too be in the photo etc. I came to the conclusion it was either moss on the bottom of the waterway or a combination of that and the reflection of trees and sky above it....so in the end I sort of 'got it'.
The other one is obvious as to what it is, so it's less abstract and more informative so I guess it's fine for an example of how to do slow shutter of moving water to give that flowing effect and still render a decent exposure, but like others have mentioned, a little more of the surrounding scenery as well might enhance the picture and give the viewer more context....depends on what else comes into view I guess.
Greg
The rule of thirds is a crock when it's use is obvious I think, I often see people using it as a matter of underlying principal no matter what, to the point of it being gratuitous...it's as if to say, look I complied with the rule and shoved the important bit over too one side and left a bunch of empty space or uninteresting stuff in the middle and now it's a proper photo.
By 'obscure' I meant those photos are more art than informative pictures, (mainly the first one), as we the audience weren't there too see the surroundings, we can only see the portion you photographed. For example, at first glance the green and blue one with the dimple is not self explanatory at all, I looked at it for some time trying to figure out what it was and what it was supposed too represent and how and where from the green and blue came too be in the photo etc. I came to the conclusion it was either moss on the bottom of the waterway or a combination of that and the reflection of trees and sky above it....so in the end I sort of 'got it'.
The other one is obvious as to what it is, so it's less abstract and more informative so I guess it's fine for an example of how to do slow shutter of moving water to give that flowing effect and still render a decent exposure, but like others have mentioned, a little more of the surrounding scenery as well might enhance the picture and give the viewer more context....depends on what else comes into view I guess.
Greg
Re: Water Shots
Hi Anna,
I much prefer the second image.
Here's one of mine:

I much prefer the second image.
Here's one of mine:

Winston Mitchell
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Water Shots
Winston,
Those shades of green are dramatic, just dramatic. Thank you for sharing.
Sury
Those shades of green are dramatic, just dramatic. Thank you for sharing.
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Re: Water Shots
Greg Beetham wrote:I didn't mention the rule of thirds actually, I don't think you need to bother too much about rule of thirds in artistic type shots.
The rule of thirds is a crock when it's use is obvious I think, I often see people using it as a matter of underlying principal no matter what, to the point of it being gratuitous...it's as if to say, look I complied with the rule and shoved the important bit over too one side and left a bunch of empty space or uninteresting stuff in the middle and now it's a proper photo.![]()
By 'obscure' I meant those photos are more art than informative pictures, (mainly the first one), as we the audience weren't there too see the surroundings, we can only see the portion you photographed. For example, at first glance the green and blue one with the dimple is not self explanatory at all, I looked at it for some time trying to figure out what it was and what it was supposed too represent and how and where from the green and blue came too be in the photo etc. I came to the conclusion it was either moss on the bottom of the waterway or a combination of that and the reflection of trees and sky above it....so in the end I sort of 'got it'.
The other one is obvious as to what it is, so it's less abstract and more informative so I guess it's fine for an example of how to do slow shutter of moving water to give that flowing effect and still render a decent exposure, but like others have mentioned, a little more of the surrounding scenery as well might enhance the picture and give the viewer more context....depends on what else comes into view I guess.
Greg
Hi I get what you mean thanks. Maybe on the second one I should have repositioned myself - although I would have been in the river to do that! I don't think that there was much else to view at that point in which case maybe it wasnt worth the shot. When you are learning this happens often I think. Good job it is digital !! In terms of the first one - do you need to know "what " it is? I tend to just look at it as a mass of colour that nature produced.
Anna
Re: Water Shots
Winston - lovely shot. Really my kinda thing. Crystal clear water - looks just like you could go and stand in it on a hot day. I've attached one of mine I did - not as good as that maybe but it has got that clear water in the foreground. Hope you like it.
- Attachments
-
- 2008 07 14 138.jpg (212.03 KiB) Viewed 6651 times
Anna
Re: Water Shots
Thanks Sury.
Nice image, ACIP. Where is that?
Henry, have you worked much on #2? I like that one a lot.
Nice image, ACIP. Where is that?
Henry, have you worked much on #2? I like that one a lot.
Winston Mitchell
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
Re: Water Shots
Wonderful, Winston.
If that was around or near where I was, I would make sure I got in there! Beautiful....
Anna, that's a beautiful scene; must be even more impressive in real ! : )
Henry, I 'believe' those shots were taken around the same time in the same area because I see some similar elements. The water splashes frozen inthe first and the translucent blue water curling in the foreground in the second shot is amazing. The second must be even more impressive in a larger size.
Yildiz
If that was around or near where I was, I would make sure I got in there! Beautiful....
Anna, that's a beautiful scene; must be even more impressive in real ! : )
Henry, I 'believe' those shots were taken around the same time in the same area because I see some similar elements. The water splashes frozen inthe first and the translucent blue water curling in the foreground in the second shot is amazing. The second must be even more impressive in a larger size.
Yildiz
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests

