what do people use instead of the kit lens on a crop camera?
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Re: what do people use instead of the kit lens on a crop camera?
As you know, the A100 shutter/mirror slap is quite loud. The A200 shutter sound is much more quieter than the A100 (I know, right now I have both). You'll want to hear the Olympus E420 and Sony A200 side by side.
-
Matt_Atkinson
- Acolyte
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:51 pm
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: what do people use instead of the kit lens on a crop camera?
I've got the 18-200 which was the kit lens on my A100-H, which is great to have (apparently not as great as 18-250), but sometimes it feels like it's just got too MUCH flexibility, so I end up using my 50 1.4. Maybe it's just me, I like primes, they're flexible in other ways (apeture) and make you think more about composition 
-
themoneyshot
- Acolyte
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:50 pm
Re: what do people use instead of the kit lens on a crop camera?
Thanks everyone.
I read a review of the e520 at dc resource and somewhere else. One of the negatives about the Olympus's is the noise gets a bit high due to the slightly smaller sensor. I'll just present some options with the pros and cons and let the person decide.
I read a review of the e520 at dc resource and somewhere else. One of the negatives about the Olympus's is the noise gets a bit high due to the slightly smaller sensor. I'll just present some options with the pros and cons and let the person decide.
Re: what do people use instead of the kit lens on a crop camera?
Another point to consider is dynamic range. I've seen some decent pics from someone I know who has an Olympus E410 with the 14-42 kit lens. I noticed that while the pics were generally good, I think it had less dynamic range when compared to the Sony A200.
Re: kit lens swap & Olys
I just broke down and swapped 3 lenses for the Tamron 18-250. Neither owners nor reviewers said enough bad things, and many raved - so that definitely lightened my load! Other than its somewhat leisurely focus compared to Minolta lenses (I didn't swap any of those
but the kit lens left) and going to f/6 at 135mm, it does very well. I'll need a Beercan or the f/3.5-4.5 version to shoot in low light, but that's OK. Samples at the site below.
http://www.picasaweb.google.com/alphaPDX/MegaTamron
As far as Olys -- when I tested cameras last year, I expected to want a small e510 but test shots were poor on WB and the dynamic range was not good. [Worse yet, despite the smaller sensors the Olys really aren't small - hence micro 4:3!] Actually the e500 was tough to put down, its test images were marvelous. If that one had IS it would have been a deal (and a steal, it was closing out w/2 lenses for under us$500). I also didn't like the focus-by-wire Zuiko lenses, regardless of high optical praise -- lenses just shouldn't work that way in my hand.
http://www.picasaweb.google.com/alphaPDX/MegaTamron
As far as Olys -- when I tested cameras last year, I expected to want a small e510 but test shots were poor on WB and the dynamic range was not good. [Worse yet, despite the smaller sensors the Olys really aren't small - hence micro 4:3!] Actually the e500 was tough to put down, its test images were marvelous. If that one had IS it would have been a deal (and a steal, it was closing out w/2 lenses for under us$500). I also didn't like the focus-by-wire Zuiko lenses, regardless of high optical praise -- lenses just shouldn't work that way in my hand.
Jim R, Oregon -- a200 + lenses & stuff
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests