Beercan on Alpha 900
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
The Norfolk escapees were coypu, not capybara - similar but smaller. I was a newspaper journalist at the time and remember the story.
Maybe I should not be surprised at the quality of the 70-210mm on the 900, as it is already proven to be excellent on the 700. But - Nikon and Canon owner experiences with older lenses and full frame have been far from positive! The Canon bodies, especially, have serious issues with corner/edge sharpness. Whatever Sony has done with the sensor and its firmware on the A900 seems to make it very 'robust' in dealing with non-telecentric, non-optimised lenses.
I remember trying the Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n with a lovely little Tokina 17mm f3.5 I had for Nikon - it was totally useless, one side of the picture was purple and the other side green! That was because of the angle of light across the wide sensor area, and a failure to make the colour filters and microlenses (if any) correctly handle the input. But here we have a full framer, of the highest resolution yet produced, taking images from almost anything you can fit on it and getting results like film.
I think that reviews by Minolta users - like me - will highlight this, but it will completely escape the attention of newbie reviewers.
David
Maybe I should not be surprised at the quality of the 70-210mm on the 900, as it is already proven to be excellent on the 700. But - Nikon and Canon owner experiences with older lenses and full frame have been far from positive! The Canon bodies, especially, have serious issues with corner/edge sharpness. Whatever Sony has done with the sensor and its firmware on the A900 seems to make it very 'robust' in dealing with non-telecentric, non-optimised lenses.
I remember trying the Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n with a lovely little Tokina 17mm f3.5 I had for Nikon - it was totally useless, one side of the picture was purple and the other side green! That was because of the angle of light across the wide sensor area, and a failure to make the colour filters and microlenses (if any) correctly handle the input. But here we have a full framer, of the highest resolution yet produced, taking images from almost anything you can fit on it and getting results like film.
I think that reviews by Minolta users - like me - will highlight this, but it will completely escape the attention of newbie reviewers.
David
-
PhotoTraveler
- Grand Caliph
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:07 am
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Ok, so not a terrier and not native.
I thought it looked a bit like one of those south american things, but wasn't sure. Thought maybe this was something DK found in the neighbor hood.
I thought it looked a bit like one of those south american things, but wasn't sure. Thought maybe this was something DK found in the neighbor hood.
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
And also keep the rest of my "oldies" witch i love so much....
KM 7D 28-135 4-4,5, 35-70 f4, 35-105 f3,5-4,5, 50 f1,7 and 70-210 f4. All Old School 
My Pictures http://www.fotosidan.se/member/view.htm?ID=116504
My Pictures http://www.fotosidan.se/member/view.htm?ID=116504
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Hi Christer and welcome to the forum.Chr_Bra wrote:Now I know for sure that I will keep my can forever,
and start saving for the a900 big time!
And also keep the rest of my "oldies" witch i love so much....
Indeed, it's a good idea to keep those wonderful lenses.
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Thanks Dr. Harout I´m pretty far from a a900 yet, but right now the 7D suits me perfect since I´m pretty low on my learningcurveDr. Harout wrote:Hi Christer and welcome to the forum.Chr_Bra wrote:Now I know for sure that I will keep my can forever,
and start saving for the a900 big time!
And also keep the rest of my "oldies" witch i love so much....![]()
Indeed, it's a good idea to keep those wonderful lenses.
KM 7D 28-135 4-4,5, 35-70 f4, 35-105 f3,5-4,5, 50 f1,7 and 70-210 f4. All Old School 
My Pictures http://www.fotosidan.se/member/view.htm?ID=116504
My Pictures http://www.fotosidan.se/member/view.htm?ID=116504
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Thanks Christer and it's from your site that I got your name 
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Very sharp indeed.
Why didn't Sony relabel this one (maybe also add SSM)?
Did they loose the blueprints?
Why didn't Sony relabel this one (maybe also add SSM)?
Did they loose the blueprints?
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
maybe because this lens has been out of production for 10 years ?
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
The f4 70-210mm was abandoned before 1990. It had not been made for 16 years when Sony took over. It was a Sakai plant design like all the very first AF models, and was effectively hand-built. Also, it suffers from extreme into the light flare without a deep lenshood to protect it. But I do think they could look at the basic design, rework it, and issue a first-class lens a bit cheaper than the 70-300mm SSM. It was exceptional. Internal zoom and constant aperture!
I should come clean on this and say that I sold my 70-200mm SSM 2.8 and kept the beercan. I know which I preferred on the A900. Not likely to be a popular view.
Just for the ref: I also sold my 200mm Macro f4 APO G. It fetched £1220 on eBay. I was amazed (that was, without box or cards etc - bare lens with a 72mm Minolta UV thrown in). That is about $1900 at current rates. I did not want the lens because it is too heavy to strap-hang. I checked all my lenses by placing my fingertip right into the part where the lens meets the mount, then walking with the lens dangling. The 70-300mm SSM is no problem. The 70-200mm SSM pressures the spring - you can feel it pulling away from the camera. The 200mm Macro does the same. It clearly stresses the mount unless fully supported (held in the hand). I often scramble over stuff, or run with my gear. I have made sure that none of my lenses causes any stress I can feel, to the camera mount. Everything has to be straphangable.
David
I should come clean on this and say that I sold my 70-200mm SSM 2.8 and kept the beercan. I know which I preferred on the A900. Not likely to be a popular view.
Just for the ref: I also sold my 200mm Macro f4 APO G. It fetched £1220 on eBay. I was amazed (that was, without box or cards etc - bare lens with a 72mm Minolta UV thrown in). That is about $1900 at current rates. I did not want the lens because it is too heavy to strap-hang. I checked all my lenses by placing my fingertip right into the part where the lens meets the mount, then walking with the lens dangling. The 70-300mm SSM is no problem. The 70-200mm SSM pressures the spring - you can feel it pulling away from the camera. The 200mm Macro does the same. It clearly stresses the mount unless fully supported (held in the hand). I often scramble over stuff, or run with my gear. I have made sure that none of my lenses causes any stress I can feel, to the camera mount. Everything has to be straphangable.
David
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Yes, same question for the 50/1.7
It feels like they don't care about the "mid range" market or maybe their factories are already running at max capacity.
The a900 partly targets landscape photographers, too bad 28/2.0 & 35/2.0 are also discontinued.
Do you thing the guys who designed these lenses are still working for Sony?
Canon sells four 70-200:
70-200 2.8L
70-200 2.8L IS
70-200 4L
70-200 4L IS
The sharpest is supposed to be 70-200 4L IS, not the 2.8 one.
I saw some Beercans on taobao (chinese ebay) for about 2500RMB (350$) is that worth it? Tamron's 70-210/2.8 is around 5600RMB (820$) here.
It feels like they don't care about the "mid range" market or maybe their factories are already running at max capacity.
The a900 partly targets landscape photographers, too bad 28/2.0 & 35/2.0 are also discontinued.
Do you thing the guys who designed these lenses are still working for Sony?
Canon sells four 70-200:
70-200 2.8L
70-200 2.8L IS
70-200 4L
70-200 4L IS
The sharpest is supposed to be 70-200 4L IS, not the 2.8 one.
I saw some Beercans on taobao (chinese ebay) for about 2500RMB (350$) is that worth it? Tamron's 70-210/2.8 is around 5600RMB (820$) here.
- KevinBarrett
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
I picked up mine for $170 USD but the seller didn't really know what he had, and the a900 was only in concept form and not quite production-ready. Even then the others weren't selling for $300 unless they were mint condition with the original lens hood. They averaged around $250 USD when I got mine in May.
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
-- Photos --
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
You should see current eBay prices. There are lenses like old 28-85mms priced up at $400+.
David
David
- KevinBarrett
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Oh, I do keep scanning ebay...I wouldn't mind trying a 28-135 on my a700, but more seriously I'm trying to assess the fair price for a 24mm f/2.8 prime. I mostly find myself using the beercan or the 50/1.7 but would love to have a wider, more "normal" prime. My wife already told me I'm not getting one for Christmas,
but I suspect there's a new CPL in my future!
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
-- Photos --
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
Unfortunately many US sellers won't ship beyond their borders (the three you quote don't) and even if they can be persuaded the cost of shipping and VAT make it not a cheap lens at all for us poor souls in the UK and EuropeSonolta wrote:28-85's are cheap on US Ebay...David Kilpatrick wrote:You should see current eBay prices. There are lenses like old 28-85mms priced up at $400+.
David
-Sonolta
Roger
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Beercan on Alpha 900
There are always cheap ones around, usually old, sometimes in good conditions, sometimes not. But it's more common now to see this kind of thing:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/new-MINOLTA-AF-SO ... 240%3A1318
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-Minolta-Zoom- ... 240%3A1318
David
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/new-MINOLTA-AF-SO ... 240%3A1318
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-Minolta-Zoom- ... 240%3A1318
David
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests