Centering defect?

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
shadowfax
Acolyte
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:02 am
Location: DeKalb, IL

Centering defect?

Unread post by shadowfax »

Would someone describe what centering defect means?

TIA,
Christopher
"Washington is were good ideas go to die!" — Senator Barack Obama

Sony A900 w/VG, A700 w/VG
Sony 50 f/1.4, 24-70Z f/2.8, 70-200G f/2.8
KM 17-35 (D), 28-75 (D)

Apple MacBook Pro w/10.5.4, Epson 1800, iPhone 3G
rogprov
Oligarch
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:10 am
Location: Gloucester, UK
Contact:

Re: Centering defect?

Unread post by rogprov »

It means that, usually through lax quality control, the individual elements of a lens have not been optimally adjusted. It could also be as a result of damaging the lens or dropping it.
Roger
User avatar
shadowfax
Acolyte
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:02 am
Location: DeKalb, IL

Re: Centering defect?

Unread post by shadowfax »

Thanks for the information. Just my guess, but I'm thinking it had a centering defect. After reading reviews of Canon's 24-70, it took photozone.de 4 samples to get a good copy. According to them it was a centering defect. That is why I asked.

Received a 24-70Z about a month ago. Only to realize the the autofocus was missing its mark 90% of the time. I checked it against:
-other lenses at the same focal length (e.g. 28-75D, 70-200G)
-used various focusing charts, everything spot on except the Zeiss
-confirmed depth of field and focal plane using a tripod, distance, et. al.
-same problem on second A700

Returned it to Sony for a full refund. Received my new one today, and it seems spot-on, of course minus some poor techniques on my part.

1) Any other suggestions on why the it missed it's mark? I read on some forum, that it's always a problem with the alignment of the three light planes of the camera.
2) Would a centering defect also affect the 24-70Z distance scale?
3) Are there limitations of the 24-70Z on the A700 body?

TIA,
Christopher
"Washington is were good ideas go to die!" — Senator Barack Obama

Sony A900 w/VG, A700 w/VG
Sony 50 f/1.4, 24-70Z f/2.8, 70-200G f/2.8
KM 17-35 (D), 28-75 (D)

Apple MacBook Pro w/10.5.4, Epson 1800, iPhone 3G
User avatar
springm
Oligarch
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:24 pm
Location: Bad Reichenhall, Germany
Contact:

Re: Centering defect?

Unread post by springm »

according to my knowledge a centering defect should show up through different sharpness in various parts of the image. What you describe sounds more like a poor calibration of the autofocus system.

Regards - Markus
01af
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:44 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Centering defect?

Unread post by 01af »

springm wrote:According to my knowledge a centering defect should show up through different sharpness in various parts of the image.
In fact, de-centering will show up as poor sharpness in the whole frame, low contrast, and strong chromatic aberrations---i. e. poor lens performance generally. With such a lens, focusing is hard because the image never will be really sharp. So centering problems may affect auto-focus performance indeed.

Different sharpness across the frame is a symptom of poor alignment of the various parts of the tubes that make up the lens' barrel, or a mis-aligned bayonet mount of lens or camera, or a mis-aligned sensor. It has nothing to do with de-centered lens elements usually ... however in a broader sense of the word, these problems may be considered 'centering problems,' too.

-- Olaf
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests