Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
-
peterottaway
- Imperial Ambassador
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:24 am
- Location: Northam, Western Australia
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
I do regard the mirror less and the EVIL cameras as the replacements for the higher end P & S up to the A 5xx models in the next five years. A FF design is possible, although I believe conventional enthusiast and pro grade D-SLR's will survive for several generations at least.
Using their expertise in APS-C sensors and electronics will mean that these cameras will be technically bedded down in the next 2 to 3 years with the electronic viewfinder being the major concern. Once the electronic viewfinders can be established to have the performance of the current penta mirror SLR's , that will be the end of them. After all, how many photographers out there can explain what is the difference between a pellix, a penta mirror and a penta prism ?
The higher end will survive for longer as there will be a demand from more traditional photographers and most pro's with higher physical reliability and performance expectations.
Also look at how long large format sheet film cameras have survived, one or more companies may keep on producing a prestige line.
Using their expertise in APS-C sensors and electronics will mean that these cameras will be technically bedded down in the next 2 to 3 years with the electronic viewfinder being the major concern. Once the electronic viewfinders can be established to have the performance of the current penta mirror SLR's , that will be the end of them. After all, how many photographers out there can explain what is the difference between a pellix, a penta mirror and a penta prism ?
The higher end will survive for longer as there will be a demand from more traditional photographers and most pro's with higher physical reliability and performance expectations.
Also look at how long large format sheet film cameras have survived, one or more companies may keep on producing a prestige line.
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
Maybe I should just get a Leica M9 and a 50mm 
- pakodominguez
- Minister with Portfolio
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
if you can afford it... the Kodak sensor is, apparently, really good!bossel wrote:Maybe I should just get a Leica M9 and a 50mm
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
peterottaway
- Imperial Ambassador
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:24 am
- Location: Northam, Western Australia
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
Err, I have sort of gone the other way. Over the last few months I have picked up a Contax G 2 with the 21 mm, 28 mm, 35 mm - 70 mm and 90 mm when I had some loose change and the price was right on E - Bay. So I went for film with AF rather than digital with mf. With my eyesight trying to accurately focus a range finder is next to impossible although no real problem with a SLR.
It will also hopefully make me less visible when traveling to the local Securitarte and the self appointed goon squads.
It will also hopefully make me less visible when traveling to the local Securitarte and the self appointed goon squads.
- KevinBarrett
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
- Contact:
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
I think the a700 successor donated half its buttons and switches to the new 500/4.
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
-- Photos --
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
A few months ago in Tokyo it was interesting to see the really cheap prices for many film cameras. I posted about it here:peterottaway wrote:Err, I have sort of gone the other way. Over the last few months I have picked up a Contax G 2 with the 21 mm, 28 mm, 35 mm - 70 mm and 90 mm when I had some loose change and the price was right on E - Bay. So I went for film with AF rather than digital with mf. With my eyesight trying to accurately focus a range finder is next to impossible although no real problem with a SLR.
http://www.photoclubalpha.com/forum/vie ... =21&t=3645
Bakubo http://www.bakubo.com
-
peterottaway
- Imperial Ambassador
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:24 am
- Location: Northam, Western Australia
Re: Two new SLR lenses a PMA 2010
I was surprised with the prices for what turned out to be like new equipment, only one lens showed a small amount of wear on a filter rim. For the whole kit I paid less than what I paid for my CZ 16 mm - 35 mm lens out of Hong Kong.
It certainly shows up the difference between what the camera companies are trying to charge and what is available out there. There are other solutions to paying top dollar.
The only problem is getting the film. Since that almost overnight collapse of film in favour of digital I have to order film in bulk and have it shipped in.
It certainly shows up the difference between what the camera companies are trying to charge and what is available out there. There are other solutions to paying top dollar.
The only problem is getting the film. Since that almost overnight collapse of film in favour of digital I have to order film in bulk and have it shipped in.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests