Photographers are suing Google. This is directly related to the book scanning lawsuit, but not a part of it.
Details here:
http://googlewatch.eweek.com/content/go ... ement.html
Dusty
Google sued by photographers.....
Re: Google sued by photographers.....
Ahh when they started on their scanning endeavor I was so hoping they wouldn't run into this kind of trouble. I personnaly think every writen work every createted should be freely available to everyone in the world who wants to have a look. If needed to have a 50 or 75 year cooling off period so the creators can make a living off it then fine but after that it should be given to everyone. I know Googles not doing this out of the goodness of their heart but they have other methods to make money than holding the human creations hostage.
- bfitzgerald
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm
Re: Google sued by photographers.....
I'm with Javelin on this one.
It's nothing more than a virtual library..a good idea. Copyright mad folks will hate it..but most think it's a good idea.
It's nothing more than a virtual library..a good idea. Copyright mad folks will hate it..but most think it's a good idea.
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: Google sued by photographers.....
Since we're talking photos in books, I think I'm rooting for Google. If I sell a photo to a book publisher and 79 million people see it, good for me! It's not like they're giving away my RAW files, just a scan of a printed page.
I do think that book authors (and photographers, musicians, etc.), should get 30-40 years to make money off of their work before it gets put into the public domain.
Dusty
I do think that book authors (and photographers, musicians, etc.), should get 30-40 years to make money off of their work before it gets put into the public domain.
Dusty
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests