Neat photo Ewannawe. Makes the mile
post more eye catching.
Those do have good true colours Sury.
Finally a day with not much wind.
![Image](http://gallery.me.com/stephanie.costumes/100261/d1/web.jpg?ver=12710457700001)
Birma,Birma wrote:Hi Sury - all comments gratefully received. I appreciate you taking the time to feedback. Looking back on them they are not quite what I had envisaged. As you say composition is the key. I can just about make the clever box of tricks expose and focus, but it is the composition that is still a big learning curve for me. I think it was Paul who posted recently to say that looking at other pictures is the only way to study and improve in this area and I agree - a real bonus of the internet is to be able to see such an array of other's images. I like the view up at the daffodil, but in retrospect I am worried that it is too grey overall, and the stamens of the lily are too dark, but I like the curve of the petals.
Hi Greg,Greg Beetham wrote:I can actually see the edges of the petals Yildiz so that's good, on my screen the flower looks almost luminous, it's quite an incredible colour scarlet ...did you find out what flower it was? I found a Camellia flower (different colour) in Wiki that looks very similar in style, so it might be a Camellia after all.
Greg
I don't think I've ever seen you submit a 'bad' photo. Very crisp, colourful and well composed.aster wrote:Thanks for the suggestion Dr. Harout and Greg,![]()
I just had a little time to prepare an other shot from this morning, same flower almost the same time.
Please feel free to say so if you see something wrong with the elements of the photo.
Yildiz
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests