Flowers (not 2010)

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by pakodominguez »

This is from October 2008
Image
A700 + Tamron 70-200 f2.8 1/250 @ f11
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by aster »

Hi Pako,

That's a beautiful 2008 lotus flower. :) Soft colours and nice reflection on the water. I like the use of the DoF as well.

Thanks for sharing,
Yildiz
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by sury »

Pako,
That was beautiful. I too love the reflection of the flower in foreground. Would a cropping of OOF flower increase the impact?

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Nice one, Pako.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by sury »

Sony A100. Nov. 2007. Natural light.

Image
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

hmmm, Sury that gives me an idea to experiment. Thanks.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by Birma »

Two great flower pictures.

Pako, I especially like the reflection in the water.

Sury, great backlighting.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by sury »

Yet one more from March 2008 from the backyard.

Image
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Vey nice Lotus Pako, I tend to agree with Sury, when you scroll the oof one out of view it looks better I think.
Good available light shot there Sury, and the violet 'hibiscusy' looking one is splendid...although I think I'd prefer the missing piece of petal at the top being there.
Greg
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by sury »

Greg,
Thank you. The missing petal is there. It was bent in such a way you see a reddish purple profile of it.
Your comment about the negative space that bent created is a valid one. I could have claimed to keep
the natural look untouched :lol: but honestly I did not pay attention to that aspect. I will keep that in mind
in future.

With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by pakodominguez »

sury wrote:Pako,
That was beautiful. I too love the reflection of the flower in foreground. Would a cropping of OOF flower increase the impact?

Sury
Hello Sury (and the others asking for "mutilate" my picture) ;-)

I understand what you mean. The first waterlily stand by herself, and the reflection in the water help. But I do like the repetition of forms and perspective the flower in the background suggest.

Regards
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by sury »

Pako,
Well, if you put it that way, then it should stay that way.... :lol:

With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
aster
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6048
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:33 pm

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by aster »

One from yesterday... Definitely from 2010! :)

Yildiz
MyriadOfBlossoms-10001.jpg
(241.99 KiB) Downloaded 930 times
Last edited by aster on Sat May 08, 2010 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by Birma »

Hi Yildiz, nice to see the cactus again - it is obviously thriving. Did you mean to put it in the "not 2010" thread? :)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Flowers (not 2010)

Unread post by pakodominguez »

January 2009 - I had rented the A900 from Adorama rentals department. I don't recall if I took this picture with the Sony 70-200 f2.8 or the Tamron 70-200 f2.8.
Image
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests