As time goes by...

Discussion of all digital SLR cameras under the Minolta and Konica Minolta brands
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
paulobro
Initiate
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Brasil

As time goes by...

Unread post by paulobro »

To tell you the truth I don't know why none of the top DSLR makers has as yet launched a top model that — a la Hasselblad — has the capacity to change, not only lenses but viewfinders and, yes, its backs...

I don't mean to say that is what I'm expecting from the new Sony(s) — although I wouldn't mind it at all 8) — but such are the thoughts that come to my mind while I sit and wait for developments. On the other hand, what are the new or changed things I really need or do expect to see in the new model(s)?

Thought we could comment on that, while we wait: what are the top 3 things you hope/expect/demand in deciding to buy what is coming?

I'll go first:

1. Clearer viewfinder enabling trustworthy manual focus (mandatory);
2. Much better, really faster AF (expect);
3. Even better SSS performance (hope).

You?
Paulo Brochado
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

Points 1 and 2 are almost mutually exclusive. To get more light to the AF system, they have to use mirrors which send less light to the focusing screen - and then use a less effective screen, or put up with a dim viewfinder.

It is time they rethought autofocus sensing from the inside out. If the focus sensors were mounted on a glass prism or next to the eyepiece assembly and measured the focus FROM the screen, all the secondary mirror stuff could be eliminated - we could have proper focusing screens - and one collimation would be all that was needed.... get the screen right, the AF would be right.

David
User avatar
paulobro
Initiate
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Brasil

Unread post by paulobro »

Well, I don't know HOW they will do it — heck!, I don't even know IF they will do it for that matter — but I find the need for precise MF/DMF mandatory in using f/1.4 lenses and the STF. Otherwise, given the very shallow DOF, even employing a viewfinder magnifier or a 2X angle finder you either must use a tripod or some other likewise support to sustain the exact distance, or sharp focuspoint placement will be a bet.

On the other hand AF tracking in the A-100 is also a bet, and one with even worse odds. I like taking birds in flight pictures for instance, and plenty of times although the AF mechanism will make noises and apparently attempt to track not one, not one take from a full series will come sharply focused. (And no, not blurred from bad tracking technique I assure you.)

If they won't, or can't fix these problems I'd see no point in upgrading.
Paulo Brochado
andrew_broadfoot
Acolyte
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:57 am
Location: Houston Texas
Contact:

Unread post by andrew_broadfoot »

Faster AF, and my number 1: less noise
Have a great day!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests