Shoot like Alcoholics Anonymous?pakodominguez wrote:Previsualisation don't need EVF or OVF, just need creativity and imagination. If you wanna go classic, get a view camera and shoot like AA
With an evil smile,
- Tom -
Shoot like Alcoholics Anonymous?pakodominguez wrote:Previsualisation don't need EVF or OVF, just need creativity and imagination. If you wanna go classic, get a view camera and shoot like AA
ah!UrsaMajor wrote:Shoot like Alcoholics Anonymous?pakodominguez wrote:Previsualisation don't need EVF or OVF, just need creativity and imagination. If you wanna go classic, get a view camera and shoot like AA![]()
With an evil smile,
- Tom -
There you go again Barry assuming things, I did ask him about what they were using at the club and he told me that most of them were “Full frame” shooters and were using 850’s and 900’s he likes doing wildlife as I do and the 580 suited him, he like me also has the 550.bfitzgerald wrote:Scooterman by far the most common Sony I have seen around DSLR wise is the A200 no doubt due to it's rock bottom low price at the time which I think was an all time low of just under £250 when it was on the market. I would imagine this probably was one of the best selling DSLR's from Sony at least in Europe I've seen quite a few around in the last few years.
A few A700's nobody with A900's. I'm sure they will do well enough with these models the SLT ones but it remains to be seen how much impact they have this year. Regarding established pros etc I'm still not seeing any impact from Sony there of course they will bag a few but nothing near to what they would like.
One thing is for sure Sony will have to nail any overheating issues, much better battery life and ghosting etc on the A77 as well as a mind blowing spec for it to have impact in the market a fast fps is given but that alone won't ensure it's a hit.
Greg's half shutter life point is also a tad worrying.
Can you not see the irony in those two conflicting statements?bfitzgerald wrote:The other point to make is the fact Sony are moving to SLT does not mean it's done "because it's better for the end user" in the same way the removal of OVF's from most compacts was purely a cost saving measure. I smell a long term cost reduction for Sony and other makers by removing OVF's and mirrors (eventually) it would not be wise to suggest it will necessarily be in the long term interests of users. The words "better" and EVF or even OVF don't really convince it's purely a personal choice.
I'd like to see Sony stop worrying about trying to be the top dog and put a lot more into actual products and improvements. It was IMO a very foolish thing for Sony to say they want to be no. 2 in the same way Samsung were ill advised to suggest they want xyz % of the ILC market. Neither are likely to get there.
bfitzgerald wrote:I'd like to see Sony stop worrying about trying to be the top dog and put a lot more into actual products and improvements.
Lonnie Utah wrote:
Can you not see the irony in those two conflicting statements?
Lets put it this way Barry You don’t like progress, if it does not suit you, it may suit many others and why Sony think that it is worth it.bfitzgerald wrote:Richard neither you nor I will be able to give any accurate indication of how many Sony users there are I simply convey my own findings on a very limited level out and about..and yourself likewise. The only thing I do bet on is that Canon and Nikon are by far the 2 biggest camera makers with the most users and between then count for the overwhelming majority of users for DSLR's.
The other point to make is the fact Sony are moving to SLT does not mean it's done "because it's better for the end user" in the same way the removal of OVF's from most compacts was purely a cost saving measure. I smell a long term cost reduction for Sony and other makers by removing OVF's and mirrors (eventually) it would not be wise to suggest it will necessarily be in the long term interests of users. The words "better" and EVF or even OVF don't really convince it's purely a personal choice.
I'd like to see Sony stop worrying about trying to be the top dog and put a lot more into actual products and improvements. It was IMO a very foolish thing for Sony to say they want to be no. 2 in the same way Samsung were ill advised to suggest they want xyz % of the ILC market. Neither are likely to get there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests