
100/2.8 macro, 1/30th, f/2.8. Obviously enough, hand held in natural light. Don't you dare call that distortion "fisheye".

My sincere appoligies, Jcoffin, if I've hurt your feelings in any way. I did read the that last line but I might have missed your exact point; I'm not much of a person that 'mocks' and that might be why I did not see the deliberate emphasis on the word.jcoffin wrote:Thanks Aster (even if you did use the dreaded "fisheye").
No, just a "soneye".jcoffin wrote:... Don't you dare call that distortion "fisheye".
Oh, goodness no. I was purely kidding around (in both cases). After years of posting on Usenet (e.g., comp.lang.c++) if I have a problem, it's that I'm so thick-skinned that even when somebody's really trying to insult me, I hardly realize it!aster wrote:My sincere appoligies, Jcoffin, if I've hurt your feelings in any way.jcoffin wrote:Thanks Aster (even if you did use the dreaded "fisheye").
Yildiz
Oh, but it's my picture, so I can call it anything I want. On the other hand, since I don't have any Sony lenses (yet!), I probably couldn't call it "Sony-eye" in any case.Dr. Harout wrote:No, just a "soneye".jcoffin wrote:... Don't you dare call that distortion "fisheye".
And don't you dare call it an abbreviation of Sony-eye!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests