Child portraits

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Anne_LilyofTheValley
Oligarch
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:29 am

Child portraits

Unread post by Anne_LilyofTheValley »

Hi all,

Lately I tried to take photos of a child. Don't know if it worked out well for me, but I tried :)

Image


Image

Thank you for your consideration.



p.s. no reflectors, no additional lights, only natural light.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Child portraits

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

The first is good but the second is a miss. Always focus on the eyes.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: Child portraits

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

Hmmm, I've got to agree with the Doc--these aren't your best, but it's probably your very least cooperative model, I imagine. It looks like you were using a fairly long focal length lens, too. For some reason, I always like my own children's portraits more when I use a wider lens. A child doesn't have a whole lot of personality in their face yet--it's still got to crystallize around the shaping factors in their life. A wider lens with a broader perspective lets you see a child in more of the environment to which they're responding.
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests