Birds 2012
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Thanks Mark and John, birds are a bit difficult to photograph on occasion and you have to hurry your shots to the point of them being snapshots but I guess that's what makes it interesting.
Greg
Greg
- Juanito200
- Viceroy
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:26 pm
- Location: McKinney, TX
Re: Birds 2012
I whole-heartedly concur Greg. Last year I spent the better part of a day trying to photograph scissor-tailed swallows on the back roads North of my house. After dozens and dozens of shots, I only came up with three or four good ones, and those were kinda iffy......
If the last thing you remember hearing is somebody yelling 'CLEAR!!!', assume you've had a problem!!
a77, a700, a200, Minolta 8000i, NEX C3, NEX 5N and more lenses than my wife suspects!
a77, a700, a200, Minolta 8000i, NEX C3, NEX 5N and more lenses than my wife suspects!
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Ha ha love it! but that's bird photography exactlyJuanito200 wrote: After dozens and dozens of shots, I only came up with three or four good ones, and those were kinda iffy......
Greg
-
aa los banos
- Oligarch
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:16 pm
- Location: western australia
Re: Birds 2012
many thanks guys, appreciate it 
@greg, yes this is the same family and they have chicks again this year
@greg, yes this is the same family and they have chicks again this year
.....it's all about timing"
Re: Birds 2012
More impressive shots! Amazing expressions on the birds' faces due to the conditions they are in. : )
Mark, those are truly good shots of the Finches. I love them.
Finally, Greg, you've got your Peewee right there where you wanted, in the photo frame. : ))
That's a very interesting black-and-white bird. Congratulations.
Nicely done everyone,
Yildiz
Mark, those are truly good shots of the Finches. I love them.
Finally, Greg, you've got your Peewee right there where you wanted, in the photo frame. : ))
That's a very interesting black-and-white bird. Congratulations.
Nicely done everyone,
Yildiz
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Many thanks Yildiz, those are plucky little birds the Peewees, they have been seen defending their nest against marauding hawks and harry them mercilessly until they leave the area.
Greg
Greg
Re: Birds 2012
I feel a bit of a fraud with these seeing as they were taken through a window from the comfort of my kitchen, but never mind. Light was poor and even at ISO800 the maximum speed/aperture combo I could get was 250/5.6 on the 70-300G so some movement blur, particularly when the nuthatch was seeing off the tit.
- Attachments
-
- DSC01584.jpg
- 1/250 ISO800 F5.6 70-300G at 300mm A900
- (201.28 KiB) Downloaded 1472 times
-
- DSC01593.jpg
- 1/250 ISO800 F5.6 70-300G at 300mm A900
- (181.62 KiB) Downloaded 1472 times
-
- DSC01577.jpg
- 1/80 ISO320 F5.6 70-300G at 300mm A900
- (239.13 KiB) Downloaded 1470 times
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Those are great artington, beautiful bokeh. I like that first one with the two birds pointing vertically downwards.
Greg
Greg
Re: Birds 2012
Thanks, Greg. Those are nuthatchs and they eat upside down.
Martin
Martin
Re: Birds 2012
These are lovely, Artington.artington wrote:Thanks, Greg. Those are nuthatchs and they eat upside down.
Martin
I love the upside-down-eating habit of the nuthatchs! : ) They make the whole picture more fun.
Photographically, these are very tasty closeups. Thanks for sharing.
What I wonder is how they get the seeds out of the cage with the holes looking smaller than the seeds themselves. Do they break the seed beween their beaks first?
Yildiz
Re: Birds 2012
Thanks, Yildiz. Those are peanuts and the appropriately named nuthatches hammer away at them like woodpeckers to break them up. The smaller birds are a little more dainty about it.aster wrote:
What I wonder is how they get the seeds out of the cage with the holes looking smaller than the seeds themselves. Do they break the seed beween their beaks first?
Yildiz
Re: Birds 2012
Three more
- Attachments
-
- DSC01603.jpg
- (242.47 KiB) Downloaded 1457 times
-
- DSC01617.jpg
- (211.26 KiB) Downloaded 1457 times
-
- DSC01653.jpg
- (187.51 KiB) Downloaded 1457 times
- Wildieswife
- Oligarch
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:43 am
- Location: England
Re: Birds 2012
Some nice/great/interesting posts here!
I've read some of this thread and heard complaints re difficult conditions and lenses not performing. I believe the Sony 70-400 mm is a good lens (some of my friends are very happy with it) but a lot would depend on the capabilities of the camera that's used and of course the user. For birds I use my old Minolta 300mm f4 with my A700 (want the A77) It's an old and battered lens but is a great piece of glass and I'm very fond of it. 5 years ago it cost less than £300
Whatever lens you are using getting close to the bird beats anything else hands down. Also - if conditions are poor (ie bad light) you will never get a really top notch shot. Light is everything - put simply photography IS light! The art is to try to work with what you have and recognise when you're flogging a dead horse.
Another important pointer - stick at it and listen to advice. Look at other images and try to see why some are good and why some are not. Never be happy with what you've done - always be self critical and aim to improve.
As regards success rate - I'm doing well if I come away with 10% that are keepers! It's often 5%.
Robin contributions from me -



Pat
I've read some of this thread and heard complaints re difficult conditions and lenses not performing. I believe the Sony 70-400 mm is a good lens (some of my friends are very happy with it) but a lot would depend on the capabilities of the camera that's used and of course the user. For birds I use my old Minolta 300mm f4 with my A700 (want the A77) It's an old and battered lens but is a great piece of glass and I'm very fond of it. 5 years ago it cost less than £300
Whatever lens you are using getting close to the bird beats anything else hands down. Also - if conditions are poor (ie bad light) you will never get a really top notch shot. Light is everything - put simply photography IS light! The art is to try to work with what you have and recognise when you're flogging a dead horse.
Another important pointer - stick at it and listen to advice. Look at other images and try to see why some are good and why some are not. Never be happy with what you've done - always be self critical and aim to improve.
As regards success rate - I'm doing well if I come away with 10% that are keepers! It's often 5%.
Robin contributions from me -



Pat
"Ah, but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now" Bob Dylan
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Pat, 2nd and 3rd are absolutely great.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests