A900 DRO ???

Specifically for the discussion of the A-mount DSLR range
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
[SiC]
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Hammarö, Sweden
Contact:

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by [SiC] »

ianmiddy wrote:
David Kilpatrick wrote:I have always done this - not -1.0, but values between 0 and -1.0. I often had my Alpha 100 set to -0.3 or -0.7 for whole shoots, for exactly the reason Hi200 exists - to avoid burned out highlights.
Hmm - same here - but now finding I have to be a little more cautious when using the 18-250 as its all too easy to use the long end and either (a) suffer shake at ISO100, or (b) suffer noise with AutoISO getting set to 400 - but glad to see I'm not doing something too ridiculous...

...and, oh dear, if only Pandora could close the box [or this topic???] - will it reach 10 pages ? !

Cheers

IDM
Me too, my dial is almost always at -1/3'rd exposure compensation.

/Z!
Sony A700, A580, Nex-5t, KM D7D & VC-7D, M Dynax 500si
KM 17-35 F2.8-4 D, M 50 F1.7 RS, M 135 F2.8, M 28-100 F3.5-5.6 D, M 100-200 F4.5, T 70-300 F4-5.6 Di USD, S 18-55 F3.5-5.6 SAM, S 18-70 F3.5-5.6
Sony hvl-f42s, Minolta 3600 HS D
Sony Z1C & Z2
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

ianmiddy wrote: I have to be a little more cautious when using the 18-250 as its all too easy to use the long end and either (a) suffer shake at ISO100, or (b) suffer noise with AutoISO getting set to 400 - but glad to see I'm not doing something too ridiculous...
If there is no sky is the picture, and the subject is not light in colour, I set -1 for all shots at tele length - such as zoos, wildlife, plants, still life, rock, sports on grass, architectural details (but not people, their faces are bright enough to get correct exposure). The meter system is intended to give correct exposures to an average scene but most tele shots are selective and need around -1 compensation to avoid them coming out much too light. B-I-F are an obvious exception as are airshow pix, seascapes and surfers, track sports on sand and anything else with a light tone.

If you don't give minus compensation or use manual exposure for shots at say 100-250mm, you risk more camera shake or more subject movement or less depth of field. Giving the correct minimum exposure is a vital part of good telephoto technique.

David
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by pakodominguez »

David Kilpatrick wrote:All that Zone Matching in the A700/A900 disables is the Contrast adjustment as far as I can tell. It almost certainly does not change raw data, but does change the embedded preview and tags for IDC. If you use the camera screen, you only ever see the preview, never the real raw data - same with IDC.
It wasn't the case with the D7D/D5D? The RAW (MRW) stays raw, Zone Matching On or Off. The Zone Matching has always work on JPGs only -that was one of my criticism about the KonikaMinolta software, even the "professional" Dimage Master is unable to reproduce that effect.

BTW, Sony could implement a more sophisticated DRO controls in the IDC.
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

pakodominguez wrote:
David Kilpatrick wrote:All that Zone Matching in the A700/A900 disables is the Contrast adjustment as far as I can tell. It almost certainly does not change raw data, but does change the embedded preview and tags for IDC. If you use the camera screen, you only ever see the preview, never the real raw data - same with IDC.
It wasn't the case with the D7D/D5D? The RAW (MRW) stays raw, Zone Matching On or Off. The Zone Matching has always work on JPGs only -that was one of my criticism about the KonikaMinolta software, even the "professional" Dimage Master is unable to reproduce that effect.

BTW, Sony could implement a more sophisticated DRO controls in the IDC.
What I meant was that while zone matching Hi-Lo on the D7D, D5D, and A100 will produce a darker raw file (Hi) or lighter raw file (Lo) and then extract the extra information to JPEG from these, the Zone High 1, High 2 and Low on the A700 and A900 just uses a normal raw file. You do not get an exposure or ISO/EI gain change. It relies entirely on raw file headroom, as does the Brightness setting.

When you use DRO+, the raw file may be much darker - but that's because DRO+ works with the matrix metering system (and is disabled with centre weighted, spot, manual etc) and fine tunes the exposure to eliminate any burned out areas. It seems to analyse the scenes using the 40-segment metering as well as the raw file - both work together to make DRO+ effective.

I do not see much difference between using DRO Basic and just changing the Brightness on the A700 and A900.

David
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by pakodominguez »

David Kilpatrick wrote: What I meant was that while zone matching Hi-Lo on the D7D, D5D, and A100 will produce a darker raw file (Hi) or lighter raw file (Lo) and then extract the extra information to JPEG from these, the Zone High 1, High 2 and Low on the A700 and A900 just uses a normal raw file. You do not get an exposure or ISO/EI gain change. It relies entirely on raw file headroom, as does the Brightness setting.
you get darker RAW while using DRO? not in Manual mode, I guess?
I barely use A/S/P modes, nothing against them. And I only use DRO for my personal work, not in events or portraits (but I used to shoot with Zone Matching all the time on the 7D) unless I can't control the light and the Bride's dress get overexposed. So I never had to deal with underexposed/darker RAW files...
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
maratrs13
Acolyte
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:31 pm

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by maratrs13 »

Sonolta wrote:
To be honest, I am growing tired of this conversation. :wink:



-Sonolta
Frankly speaking, me too! If talking to each other in different languages could be named 'conversation' then something goes wrong in this world... :?

Marat.
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

pakodominguez wrote:
David Kilpatrick wrote: What I meant was that while zone matching Hi-Lo on the D7D, D5D, and A100 will produce a darker raw file (Hi) or lighter raw file (Lo) and then extract the extra information to JPEG from these, the Zone High 1, High 2 and Low on the A700 and A900 just uses a normal raw file. You do not get an exposure or ISO/EI gain change. It relies entirely on raw file headroom, as does the Brightness setting.
you get darker RAW while using DRO? not in Manual mode, I guess?
I barely use A/S/P modes, nothing against them. And I only use DRO for my personal work, not in events or portraits (but I used to shoot with Zone Matching all the time on the 7D) unless I can't control the light and the Bride's dress get overexposed. So I never had to deal with underexposed/darker RAW files...
The way DRO+ works with manual exposures must be different from the way it works with auto ones. It is suppose to communicate with the metering (40-zone mode) and in the A100, it was not able work without this (disabled in spot, centre weighted or manual). In the A700/A900 is can apparently work in any mode, even manual or spot metering, but I have no idea how it can do this properly - what if you totally under or over expose manually?

And I've checked - Zone -1, +1 and +2 may use a normal RAW (no gain adjustment) but - and this is REALLY uncalled for! - they change the exposure instead. So, you set ISO 100, put the camera on a tripod and block of the eyepiece, and meter with no Zone setting - 1/4 at f4. Shift to Zone +1 - 1/5 at f4. Shift to Zone +2 - 1/8 at f4. Shift to Zone -1 and get 1/3 at f4. The ISO stays at 100! In other words, if you set Zone Matching and then use a studio flash, or a hand-held exposure meter, you would get wrong exposure.

DRO does not change the exposure and can work in manual modes - but when matrix evaluative metering is enabled, it seems to cut the exposure so that the highlights are never overexposed. Clearly Sony has built in a whole range of behaviours so that DRO, DRO Advanced, DRO+ and Zone Matching will not be disabled by other camera settings, but you really are getting some very unpredictable results and misleading 'settings'. I have just found that DRO Auto reduced exposure by 1/3 stop, while DRO Standard and Manual +3 left it unchanged (for a one particular subject). Sony state that Zone Matching works with RAW on the A700 and A900 - sure, it under or over exposes! All they claim is that it helps prevent under or over exposure.

It seems that from changing sensor gain in the D7D, D5D and A100 Sony has moved to changing actual exposure given, to produce these modifications to contrast and range.

One thing is really clear from investigating this, if you want the lowest possible noise and the best files for raw conversion, don't rely on DRO or Zone Matching - shoot raw straight and get the exposure right! Don apparently shoots using manual settings most of the time, and really, that means he is bypassing these functions except when going for in-camera JPEGs. Ultimately, manual settings represent the best control you can have over the final result.

David
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: A900 DRO ???

Unread post by Javelin »

Well hopefully it won't be that bad Sony turned my waterlogged A700 around in less than a week

Sonolta wrote: Then maybe we should change the topic to Sony QC and reliability...which seems to be a bit lacking. I am certain my BROKEN AF after only 11 months means the same thing almost everywhere in the world, which is, I'm screwed for a while. :cry: :evil:

-Sonolta
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests