Sury, the lens I was referring to is the Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* DT 16-80 F3.5-4.5 SAL-1680CZ
with the Doc's lens would be about $150 more than just the 24-70
Cheers DA
SAL70-400--G - Love it
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
-
david antony
- Viceroy
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:32 pm
- Location: tsawwassen, bc. canada.
-
sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: SAL70-400--G - Love it
Mea culpa. You are suggesting I get a 1680CZ AND 24f2 for couple of hundred more than
it costs a CZ24-70. Since 1680 is DT lens, which means A900 becomes a 12MP camera with
that lens, right? On the other hand, wouldn't I be in lens heaven if I were to get 2470 AND 24f2?
Just thinking aloud.
But that would be a significant investment and one that will last a lifetime, I am
sure.
With best regards,
Sury
it costs a CZ24-70. Since 1680 is DT lens, which means A900 becomes a 12MP camera with
that lens, right? On the other hand, wouldn't I be in lens heaven if I were to get 2470 AND 24f2?
Just thinking aloud.
But that would be a significant investment and one that will last a lifetime, I amsure.
With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
david antony
- Viceroy
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:32 pm
- Location: tsawwassen, bc. canada.
Re: SAL70-400--G - Love it
Sorry was not thinking A900. In that case go for the 2470 and 24f2
Cheers DA
Cheers DA
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests