Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
gio67
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:27 am

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by gio67 »

those tiny sensors are growing B
2000 Olympus D-340R 1.2mp (bought for my wife)
2001 Olympus D-510Z 2.1mp
2002 Minolta D7i 5mp (sold in 2004)
2004 Canon A70 3.2mp
2006 Canon A540 6mp
2008 Canon A590IS 8mp
2012 Canon S95 10mp
2013 Canon G15 12.1mp
2013 Canon A4000IS 16mp (bought for my wife)
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

gio67 wrote:those tiny sensors are growing B
2000 Olympus D-340R 1.2mp (bought for my wife)
2001 Olympus D-510Z 2.1mp
2002 Minolta D7i 5mp (sold in 2004)
2004 Canon A70 3.2mp
2006 Canon A540 6mp
2008 Canon A590IS 8mp
2012 Canon S95 10mp
2013 Canon G15 12.1mp
2013 Canon A4000IS 16mp (bought for my wife)
Actually, my 2002 Minolta D7i had the largest sensor (2/3"). All of the sensors since then have been smaller. The current Fuji X10 and X20 also have a 2/3" sensor.
User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Cogito »

mvanrheenen wrote: The images are great Tony. Very colorful. A shame about the rough quality of the first image becausr it's a great composition!
Mark
The 1st image has been reworked, my latest effort at pp is in the original post... And looks a bit better :?: :?: :?:
This was actually my favourite shot of the fireworks - still ISO 100, f2, 1/2sec. And a bit sharper.

Image
Last edited by Cogito on Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by sury »

Wow!!! Curious to know which camera embodied that sensor.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Cogito »

Sury, if you're referring to that last fireworks image, it was my Epson 850Z. Umm, I guess it must be a feature of the browser I use most of the time, Opera, but right-clicking on an image gives a drop-down box one item of which is "image properties". Selecting that give the Exif info!
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

The Epson 850Z was a 1999 2.1mp digicam with a 35-105mm lens. In January 2000 I bought my wife a 1999 Olympus D-340R 1.3mp with 36mm lens. She mostly used it for snapshots and although I tried to keep the camera set for maximum size and quality she would often change it to 640x480 pixel mode with more jpeg compression so she could get more photos on the 8mb SmartMedia card. :) Mostly that was okay, but there are a few photos she took of friends, etc. that I wish were the maximum size. I occasionally played with it and took a few photos. Here are a couple of photos I took with it the morning after a Texas ice storm in 2000:

Image

Image
Last edited by bakubo on Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Pretty good fireworks Tony, I tried to take some a year or so ago and sortof did ok but I couldn't get any blue ones properly they all came out white-ish, the green and reds weren't too bad though for some reason. You actually got some blue in yours, well done.

Henry you can't get that much detail from such a tiny MP sensor, everyone knows that. :mrgreen: Great demonstration of what's actually possible though. :D
Greg
User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Cogito »

bakubo wrote:The Epson 850Z was a 1999 2.1mp digicam with a 35-105mm lens. In January 2000 I bought my wife a 1999 Olympus D-340R 1.3mp with 36mm lens. She mostly used it for snapshots and although I tried to keep the camera set for maximum size and quality she would often change it to 640x480 pixel mode with more jpeg compression so she could get more photos on the 8mb SmartMedia card. :) Mostly that was okay, but there are a few photos she took of friends, etc. that I wish were the maximum size. I occasionally played with it and took a few photos. Here are a couple of photos I took with it the morning after a Texas ice storm in 2000:
I think they came out quite well, Henry.
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Birma »

Some great examples of why its not all about the mega pixels Tony and Henry :)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

A few days ago we were driving on a highway in Texas and a thunderstorm started rolling in. We stopped and I took a few photos of the awesome clouds with the Canon S95 before the rain started. Of course, I wish there was a better foreground, but sometimes you have to take what you get. :lol:

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by sury »

Wow!

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Birma »

+1 for the Wow - great clouds Henry.

I really like the Motel 6 sign in the foreground - there are some people who seem to make a living out of photographing those things so some people might think that foreground is fine Henry :)
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Cogito »

Henry, the splash of colour in the 1st one really makes it. The clouds in all 3 are also pretty d*mn good!
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Great but ominous looking clouds Henry, they looks a tad too ominous for my liking, could be a touchdown in the making.
Greg
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Greg Beetham wrote:Great but ominous looking clouds Henry, they looks a tad too ominous for my liking, could be a touchdown in the making.
Yeah, a guy who had pulled off the highway and was standing near me also wondered about whether a tornado might develop. It had crossed my mind too. Fortunately, it was just rain and it didn't even last all that long. Here is one more photo pointing in a different direction.

Image
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 62 guests