70-400G January 09

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

70-400G January 09

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Image
B&H have it listed now, and production lenses available approx Jan 09...$1500 US, not quite double the price of the 70-300G....does look nice though.
Greg
ps I might have some teething troubles getting used to the zoom collar being at the front and the focus collar at the back...for a little while.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/5 ... 5_6_G.html
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Javelin »

My 28-138 is is a rear focus lens too and it does take a second to get used to. the first time I mounted it I realized that some left hand fingers are at the root of the lens and I had to change that habit.. but it startled me at first
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I thought it might end up being some hideous roof silver colour, but it's more of a light grey...very nice.
Greg
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Greg Beetham wrote:I thought it might end up being some hideous roof silver colour, but it's more of a light grey...very nice.
Greg
Which means: "Hey, look at me, I'm a lens here" :lol:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

I wonder if Sony intends to make all their big, G "white lenses" this silvery grey color?
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Noooo~, they just forgot to clean it... :lol:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
alphaomega
Viceroy
Posts: 1196
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by alphaomega »

I have been looking for a telephoto zoom for my A700/350 for some time, not being able to make up my mind. As I already have the Tamron 18-250 I am really looking for something longer but with a max. F stop of F5.6 at the long end. The SAL 70-400 F4-5.6 would seem to fit the bill here so I might wait and see what the price is going to be here in the UK. It would seem to be above £1000 and I am not sure if I want to spend that kind of money for recreational use only. I do not see myself as a budding commercial wildlife photograper. Hopefully the lens will be both fast zooming and delivering top quality IQ.

Any suggestions for an alternative min. 400 mm at the long end and no more than F5.6 delivering decent IQ for my A700?
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

There doesn't seem to be much choice in quality superzooms above 300mm, there is the 200-500 Tamron and the 50-500 Sigma, the sigma being quite a bit more expensive than the Tamron but gets quite good reviews, the penalty is they are both slower than f5.6. being f6.3

As an aside, I just noticed that Sigma have released the new 70-200 f2.8 II DG APO Macro HSM for the A-Mount ($799 US) and B&H list it as In Stock, I wonder if anyone has had hands on yet?
Greg
alphaomega
Viceroy
Posts: 1196
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by alphaomega »

Greg Beetham wrote
There doesn't seem to be much choice in quality superzooms above 300mm, there is the 200-500 Tamron and the 50-500 Sigma, the sigma being quite a bit more expensive than the Tamron but gets quite good reviews, the penalty is they are both slower than f5.6. being f6.3
I was looking at the Sigma Web site here in UK and they appear to have a 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM available listed for Sony as well as the usual suspects. This telephoto zoom lens incorporates Sigma’s original OS (Optical Stabiliser) system. It offers the equivalent of using a shutter speed approximately 4 stops faster. I really do not need this with Sony's SSS in my A700 & A350 but it covers my desired range and is within my F5.6 desired max. F stop at the long end. Anyone with any experience of this zoom? The Dyxum reviews are all of an earlier model without OS. Maybe I should look out for a 2nd hand copy without OS on ebay as the OS version is 1.750 Kg whereas the old version appears to be no more than 1.2 kg. Quite a difference. I wonder if this is solely caused by OS? If that is so SSS is a real boon for tele zooms. They are heavy enough without lens stabilization. Thanks Minolta/Sony.
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

The version for Sony does not have the OS system, but is the same price as those which do. It is HSM.

David
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Yep that lens new is in the Sigma lens list alright (I noticed it last night on the US list), but it's not listed as being available in the A-mount...then again, Sigma have made the odd little boo boo from time to time with the info about features and available mounts before...David obvously knows of it's existance and mount availability, so the US info appears not too be up to speed yet.
And yes I agree it's a most attractive lens..in features..but we really need to know how it performs in practise from user point of view...before shelling out the hard earned...ideally. There is a short review here at Pop Photo...they give it the thumbs up.
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/54 ... s-hsm.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Greg

btw Has anyone seen/heard from PT lately.... :?:
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

Greg Beetham wrote:Yep that lens new is in the Sigma lens list alright (I noticed it last night on the US list), but it's not listed as being available in the A-mount...then again, Sigma have made the odd little boo boo from time to time with the info about features and available mounts before...David obvously knows of it's existance and mount availability, so the US info appears not too be up to speed yet.
It was shown at photokina. Both the new long OS zooms will be made in non-OS, HSM version for Sony and Pentax but they are not out yet.

David
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Javelin »

Just spotted this on the US sonystyle site. are there any Silver Alpha bodies out there?

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/sto ... d=11033925" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I wonder if there going to intorduce some? why would anyone put a silver flash shoe cap on a black bamera body?
stevecim
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Australia

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by stevecim »

you can get these in japan

http://www.sony.jp/products/Consumer/ds ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

not quite silver, and the flash mount is still black
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: 70-400G January 09

Unread post by Javelin »

Ya looks kinda goldish... I suppose they could bring silver cameras back and do it tastefully. wouldn't they need leather too though? then we could all be aconsted by zealots from Canon, Nikon and PETA !

The problem is theres been so much silver electronic equipment over the years people equate it with cheap plastic when it was first intended to imitate metal
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests