What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Post Reply
henniebez
Initiate
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:48 am

What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by henniebez »

I want a macro lens!


Is the sony/minolta good enough, or is there space for a Zeiss one. I know there is alot of open spaces in the Sony lens line up! But you know every man may have a dream! A dream like no other!

Hennie
Top
User avatar
RobbieA
Oligarch
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: South Africa

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by RobbieA »

Wow meneer, 'n verassing om jou hier te kry.

Enige Zeiss lens sal 'n aanwins vir die Sony reeks wees. Daar is net een klein probleemtjie, die prys!! Maar die Sony 105 Macro is 'n uitstekende lens.
Top
henniebez
Initiate
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:48 am

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by henniebez »

Hi Robbie

Jip ek vind hierdie forum die mees ingeligste as dit kom by die alpha sisteem. David in my oë is kundig en ook baie beskeie en eerlik. Lekker om jou hier te sien!

Hennie
Top
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:
Contact Dr. Harout

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Ես Ձեր գրածից բան չհասկացա, խնդիր չէ, Դուք էլ հիմա Ձեր գլուխները ջարդեք հասկանալու թե ես ի՞նչ եմ գրել։ :lol: :wink:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Top
User avatar
RobbieA
Oligarch
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: South Africa

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by RobbieA »

Dr. Harout wrote:Ես Ձեր գրածից բան չհասկացա, խնդիր չէ, Դուք էլ հիմա Ձեր գլուխները ջարդեք հասկանալու թե ես ի՞նչ եմ գրել։ :lol: :wink:
Wow, you also think so Doc? I am so pleased. Didn't realise you also spoke so many languages. :D :D :D
Top
User avatar
[SiC]
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Hammarö, Sweden
Contact:
Contact [SiC]

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by [SiC] »

Om ni kunde vara så vänliga att hålla er till engelska i forumet... :P
Sony A700, A580, Nex-5t, KM D7D & VC-7D, M Dynax 500si
KM 17-35 F2.8-4 D, M 50 F1.7 RS, M 135 F2.8, M 28-100 F3.5-5.6 D, M 100-200 F4.5, T 70-300 F4-5.6 Di USD, S 18-55 F3.5-5.6 SAM, S 18-70 F3.5-5.6
Sony hvl-f42s, Minolta 3600 HS D
Sony Z1C & Z2
Top
henniebez
Initiate
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:48 am

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by henniebez »

Sorry guys!
Top
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:
Contact Dr. Harout

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Was just kidding :lol: :lol:

Anyway, something similar might have happened in Babylon :?
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Top
henniebez
Initiate
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:48 am

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by henniebez »

Well, we are trying to build the largest and most advanced camera system! Camera system like no other!
Top
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:
Contact pakodominguez

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by pakodominguez »

the only issue with the Minolta/Sony Macro lenses (at least the 50mm 2.8 and the 100mm 2.8, I haven't try the 50mm 3.5) is the slow focus. On any camera. But opticaly, they are the best Macro lenses around. The 100mm 2.8 specially: an object of desire...

Regards
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Top
rogprov
Oligarch
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:10 am
Location: Gloucester, UK
Contact:
Contact rogprov

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by rogprov »

pakodominguez wrote:the only issue with the Minolta/Sony Macro lenses (at least the 50mm 2.8 and the 100mm 2.8, I haven't try the 50mm 3.5) is the slow focus. On any camera. But opticaly, they are the best Macro lenses around. The 100mm 2.8 specially: an object of desire...

Regards
Macro lenses need finer focussing - more turns end to end - so they're bound to be a bit slower than ordinary lenses. No?
Roger
Top
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:
Contact Dr. Harout

Re: What about a Zeiss macro lens?

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

rogprov wrote:Macro lenses need finer focussing - more turns end to end - so they're bound to be a bit slower than ordinary lenses. No?
Exactly :!:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Lens Lore”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests