70-400G in Atlanta
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
70-400G in Atlanta
David...I hope you don't mind, but I will link to Dyxum instead of re-posting this here.
This link will show a visual comparison to the 70-200G and the Tamron 200-500 as well as a couple images taken at the feeder. I am heading off to Florida on Saturday for a bit of birding and I will post along the way if the hotel has adequate high speed service. I have rented a Sony 1.4 TC and a Kenko Pro 1.4(1.5)TC to see if I can get some extra reach. If the Kenko has adequate AF and IQ is somewhat close, I will get it, but I want to compare the IQ of these 2.
This link will show a visual comparison to the 70-200G and the Tamron 200-500 as well as a couple images taken at the feeder. I am heading off to Florida on Saturday for a bit of birding and I will post along the way if the hotel has adequate high speed service. I have rented a Sony 1.4 TC and a Kenko Pro 1.4(1.5)TC to see if I can get some extra reach. If the Kenko has adequate AF and IQ is somewhat close, I will get it, but I want to compare the IQ of these 2.
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
No problem linking to Dyxum, but why not link the images to a post here?
I often ignore posts which only contain links, not images, and I am sure many others do. If you don't see the image directly on opening the post, it's not as interesting.
David
I often ignore posts which only contain links, not images, and I am sure many others do. If you don't see the image directly on opening the post, it's not as interesting.
David
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
Alright...will do.David Kilpatrick wrote:No problem linking to Dyxum, but why not link the images to a post here?
I often ignore posts which only contain links, not images, and I am sure many others do. If you don't see the image directly on opening the post, it's not as interesting.
David



- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
Few comments with your permission:
1- Very nice bird shots, but may I ask how much sharpening on PP? Or is the lens that sharp?
2- In my opinion I think the knob for fixing the tripod collar on the Tamron is much much better than the Sony ones. It should be much easier tightening/loosening the Tamron one
Just let me know your thoughts on this.
3- I like the bokeh on 400mm (btw, are the pictures cropped?)
4- Now you've done it,
I don't know which to discard from my list the 70-300 or 70-400
Thanks for sharing.
1- Very nice bird shots, but may I ask how much sharpening on PP? Or is the lens that sharp?
2- In my opinion I think the knob for fixing the tripod collar on the Tamron is much much better than the Sony ones. It should be much easier tightening/loosening the Tamron one
3- I like the bokeh on 400mm (btw, are the pictures cropped?)
4- Now you've done it,
Thanks for sharing.
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
Very nice, thanks for sharing ... be great to see them compared at maximum extension 
Roger
- KevinBarrett
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
- Contact:
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
When my wife sees me looking at pictures like the first three on this page, she calls it "camera p*rn."
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
-- Photos --
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
1. I used a level of 2 on Focus magic (the same level I use for the 70-200G...I use a 4 or 5 for my Tamron 200-500). I'd say it is as sharp at these apertures as the 70-200G (mind you that i have used this lens for all of 15 min.)Dr. Harout wrote:Few comments with your permission:
1- Very nice bird shots, but may I ask how much sharpening on PP? Or is the lens that sharp?
2- In my opinion I think the knob for fixing the tripod collar on the Tamron is much much better than the Sony ones. It should be much easier tightening/loosening the Tamron oneJust let me know your thoughts on this.
3- I like the bokeh on 400mm (btw, are the pictures cropped?)
4- Now you've done it,I don't know which to discard from my list the 70-300 or 70-400
Thanks for sharing.
2.If find I have no problem with the knobs and tightening. Be warned that the 70-400 will roll off a table (caught fortunately) when sitting on the tripod foot and no camera.
3.In the 2nd bird image....that is a tree, a swing set and a bush in the BG....'nough said? Yes they are cropped a small amount.
4.I say go for the 70-400 if you can spare the extra coin.....more distance and better construction/features
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
If I have time after getting home from work and before packing for my trip, I will set one up.rogprov wrote:Very nice, thanks for sharing ... be great to see them compared at maximum extension
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
calpon wrote:If I have time after getting home from work and before packing for my trip, I will set one up.rogprov wrote:Very nice, thanks for sharing ... be great to see them compared at maximum extension
I look forward to seeing that
Roger
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
I didn't know that Focus Magic could be used for routine sharpening. I thought it was just a tool to try to correct a bit for photos that are out of focus and motion blur. Are you saying you use it routinely for normal, in focus shots too? Is it better than using USM or Smart Sharpen?calpon wrote:1. I used a level of 2 on Focus magic (the same level I use for the 70-200G...I use a 4 or 5 for my Tamron 200-500). I'd say it is as sharp at these apertures as the 70-200G (mind you that i have used this lens for all of 15 min.)
Bakubo http://www.bakubo.com
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
Nice shots, Calpon. I'll be interested in hearing a lot more about these lenses when you get back.
Dusty
Dusty
An a700, an a550 and couple of a580s, plus even more lenses (Zeiss included!).
- harveyzone
- Oligarch
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 11:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, England
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
KevinBarrett wrote:When my wife sees me looking at pictures like the first three on this page, she calls it "camera p*rn."
It isn't really though is it - they all have their caps on.
--
Tom
Tom
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
I'm off to Egypt this Sunday. I had hoped to have the Sony 70-400 with me. The Minolta 100-400 will have to do. Not so terrible; it has served me well in Kenya and Tanzania.
Winston Mitchell
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: 70-400G in Atlanta
And you'll post some of your shot when you return, I hope?Winston wrote:I'm off to Egypt this Sunday. I had hoped to have the Sony 70-400 with me. The Minolta 100-400 will have to do. Not so terrible; it has served me well in Kenya and Tanzania.
I don't know which parts you're going to, but you can spend a week in the Valley of the Kings and not have enough time!
Dusty
An a700, an a550 and couple of a580s, plus even more lenses (Zeiss included!).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests



